12,595 Publications · 75,371 Citations

We measured how radius-grid spacing and offset change the absolute difference between Sholl profiles after a center movement. The analysis used 12 mouse neuron traces from the Allen Cell Types Database (2015), with 72 repeated comparisons at each movement and spacing. For 1 µm movements with soma connections, the median relative RMS error across uniform grid offset was 10.7785% at 1 µm spacing, 44.5315% at 5 µm, and 67.9780% at 10 µm. At 10 µm spacing, all 72 comparisons had some offset length with error above 50% of the continuous difference; the median such fraction was 42.0624%. These are summaries of this fixed sample, not population estimates or biological error rates. Removing soma connections gave a 56.8436% median at 10 µm spacing for 1 µm movements. The mean grid estimate equals the continuous difference under the uniform-offset calculation, but individual offsets can have large errors. One of 864 numerical extrema differed between binary64 and 50-digit decimal arithmetic (103 versus 102 count·µm); the discrepancy is retained and does not affect the RMS result. The stored paths, movements, coordinate scale, and uniform offset are calculation assumptions. The study does not establish a biological cause or a general radius-spacing rule.

A new implementation reproduces 22,776 archived sample weights for the ds000102 fixed-response analysis, with a maximum absolute difference of 6.050715484207103e-15. It also reproduces all 1,404 response-test rows, with a largest numeric-cell difference of 4.0745185003743245e-14, and agrees on table keys, model ranks, and label-audit counts. Under an assumed HRF lag of +0.5 s, a lag-derivative estimator has a smaller balanced contrast bound in all 26 second runs, while its unrestricted bound is larger in five runs. These are model-based calculations from event times, not measured brain effects. The nine-curve grid is not a measured HRF range; run-2 condition labels remain unresolved in 304 rows, and the analysis does not resolve the missing measured response range.

A separately written quaternion rotation program reproduces the reported coordinate results for 1,462 tested subsets of the 6V5D ubiquitin ensemble. All subset membership lists and top-ten overlap counts match exactly; the largest ratio difference is 2.6645352591003757e-15, within fixed absolute and relative tolerances of 1e-9. The comparison does not test true refinement-group membership: the deposited-model-to-group map is absent. The measured ratio describes fitted coordinate spread in one fixed deposited ensemble, not physical uncertainty, model accuracy, motion timescales, or biological causality.

We tested whether the 20 ms update in released flyvis 1.2.0 models removes full voltage-state information. We used all 50 models, with their wiring and learned parameters fixed. Each model started at its learned bias and received gray input for one second. If a coordinate has a learned time constant at or below 20 ms and a negative voltage, its direct retention is zero and its rectified output is zero. Changing such a voltage while it stays negative gives the same next full state. This exact test found 3,241 to 10,596 independent lost directions per model, or lower bounds of 7.1% to 23.2% of the 45,669 model coordinates. The median bound was 14.9%. There were 4 to 17 certified coordinates among the 65 central units. A voltage margin of 0.001 gave a median bound of 6,795 directions. Five full-network perturbation tests confirmed the map identity to rounding precision. Smaller Euler steps retained the perturbation and approached the conditional continuous decay of exp(-1) after 20 ms. Source arrays rebuilt exactly, and a clean repeat matched all new numerical results. Under the usual ODE uniqueness condition, distinct full starting states cannot merge in finite time. Thus this update cannot equal such a flow on the same state space near the tested states. The result concerns model state, not measured fly physiology, visual task loss or useful memory. The package preserves the proof, code, source provenance, arrays, results and figures.

We tested how numerical time steps changed flash responses in 50 released fly vision models. Each model had 45,669 units and 1,513,231 connectome-based connections. For each model, all solvers used the same state after one second of grey input. Bright and dark pulses lasted 80 ms. We held the wiring and weights fixed. Each effective membrane time constant was fixed at 20 ms or more. We compared Euler updates with an adaptive solution of the same ordinary differential equation (ODE). We measured central T4 and T5 voltage responses relative to each solver's grey trajectory. All responses used the same 20 ms sample grid. The median across models of the median peak ratio was 3.15. The median waveform error was 220.7% at 20 ms and 20.4% at 5 ms. The native time-constant floor changed 5 ms waveforms by a median 2.16%. The largest reference change was 3.67% in one weak response. The tested stricter references left the ensemble medians unchanged. The source stored 2,396 of 3,250 time constants below 20 ms. Those values have no local effect on a fixed 20 ms update. This test shows that numerical steps can set transient gain in these models. It tests a continuous-time interpretation of released parameters. Tests of motion tuning, task error and living-fly responses are separate work. The package has source archives, checksums, code, response arrays, figures and repeat instructions.