Can causal measurements rule out hidden routes instead of direct neural links? We give proofs and generated-model tests. For a stable positive linear circuit with unit observed decay, the minimum hidden-state count for an exact DC match with no direct observed links equals the nonnegative rank of its coupling matrix. Fast hidden states can also match the full response within any positive error limit on a fixed finite frequency band, if hidden rates have no upper bound. A continuous-band bound states a sufficient rate. With known decay and calibrated inputs and outputs, singular values of response residuals stacked across frequencies give a lower bound on hidden-state count under a stated error bound. This certificate also holds for signed hidden circuits. In a constructed example, DC certifies one state, while three frequencies certify two with stack error 0.001. A four-state support example needs four positive hidden states although its ordinary rank is three. Three 12-state model families and 200 independent random circuit checks support the formulas. Unknown decay can give a false count. These are model results, not new animal measurements. They do not identify individual edges or explain the observed cross-species node-similarity structure.
We tested whether higher forecast thresholds always reduce commands with no recorded keypress in the next 100 ms. We used fixed task plus SEEG forecasts from eight people in public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Each emitted command started a 1 s wait. All eight test streams had an unmatched count increase at some steps: 286 of 26,879 steps. Total command counts never increased. A two-candidate proof explains the result. All main increases occurred at low thresholds and above 9.89 unmatched commands per minute. At an early limit of one unmatched command per minute, first feasible and tail feasible rules chose identical thresholds. The later equal-person mean was 1.29 unmatched commands per minute; five of eight people exceeded the limit. Thus the stricter rule gave no benefit at the tested limit. The package contains an exact audit tool, full curves, three figures, source hashes, raw retrieval recipes, and repeat instructions. An independent scheduler checked all 402,360 curve thresholds. Fresh raw ranges matched for all eight people. The result applies to fixed recorded streams. It does not show intent, live BCI benefit, or stimulation effects.
We tested whether calibration limits stop later command bursts in continuous SEEG reading. We used fixed readers for eight people in OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Both rules met an average calibration limit of three background commands per eligible minute. The added rule also bounded each moving minute. The eligible clock excluded windows near recorded keypresses. Seven of eight later offline tests exceeded the moving-minute bound. Background commands fell from 103 to 85, while keypress detections fell from 61 to 55 out of 340. The mean fraction of moving intervals above the bound fell from 53.34 to 42.41 percent. The paired sign-flip reference was p = 0.125. One calibration block had 54 eligible seconds and used a whole-block bound. The package includes exact count code, frozen readers, features, range hashes, figures, and repeat instructions. A fresh source audit checked 16 ranges. Background commands are a proxy for unwanted output. This reused sample did not test live control or stimulation.
Fitting under a state norm limit retained more phase accuracy than scaling state weights after fitting in the main simulated-gap test. We tested nine reused public SEEG rest records from OpenNeuro ds006065 and ds005670, version 1.0.0. Each record supplied four fixed pairs. The target was an intact causal 7 Hz filter. A convex fit changed 67 of 144 gap maps and kept every complete gap map norm at most 0.95. With changing simulated gaps of 20 to 200 ms, mean phase error fell from 65.24 to 50.97 degrees against the earlier scaled guard. All nine record means improved. The paired descriptive interval for the change was -17.70 to -11.66 degrees. State error also fell. Projection without refitting gave 65.19 degrees. The burst schedule had no mean phase gain against the scaled guard. The phase gain over held voltage occurred in only five of nine record means. The norm bound contracts initial state differences for arbitrary supported gap order under shared voltage histories; it does not bound error against the intact filter. This is an exploratory offline result on reused records. No neural phase truth, measured stimulation artifact, or stimulation effect was tested. The package preserves selected voltage, fitted models, code, a proof, figures, source receipts, independent checks, and reproduction instructions. Fresh public prefixes reproduced all 7.2 million selected voltage values exactly. A separate numerical rerun reproduced all 117 result files exactly.
We tested two output gates on the same eight-shaft input budget. The public source was OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Eight reused clinical records supplied 1,332 fit trials and 674 later test trials. Each test trial supplied a rest window and a pre-response window. Six votes from eight separate shaft readers gave 32.49% mean correct output over all offered windows. Full agreement among three separate shaft groups gave 27.45%. The paired advantage for eight readers was 5.04 percentage points. Its descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was 3.17 to 6.98 points. All eight records favored the eight-reader rule. The exact sign-flip value was 0.0078125. Mean wrong output was 8.38% and 6.24%, respectively. A proof shows that one arbitrary shaft feature change cannot make an accepted label differ from that rule's clean majority. The proof covers clean withheld inputs. It does not certify a true brain state. Wrong clean majorities can still give newly admitted wrong outputs. All 21,568 saved finite fault cases passed replay. Fresh source ranges rebuilt 16 trials exactly. The package preserves features, code, fits, outputs, figures, source records, and repeat instructions. This is an offline method test with known event times and future-dependent eligibility. It does not test live control or stimulation.
A brain-computer interface can send repeated commands while a reader score stays above a threshold. We tested a reset rule on public SEEG data from eight people. The rule required a low score before another command. We kept the reader coefficients, thresholds, and one-second wait fixed. The primary thresholds had an earlier target of three background commands per eligible minute. In 44.84 later task minutes, reset removed one of 264 commands. It kept all 61 detected keypresses out of 340. Background commands fell from 103 to 102. The mean paired rate change was -0.069 commands per eligible minute. The exploratory 95% person-bootstrap interval was [-0.207, 0.000]. Only one of 304 high-score intervals had a repeat command. Reset had little effect under these fixed conditions. This result does not show population equivalence or control of unintended commands. The package includes a causal scheduler, a command audit, all compact inputs, raw-data retrieval recipes, figures, and source checks. This is an offline study of reused task data. It did not test brain stimulation.
Two individually stable observation schedules gave an unstable alternating product in two of 36 fixed SEEG readers. The readers used nine public rest records from OpenNeuro ds006065 and ds005670, version 1.0.0. All gaps were simulated and lasted 100 ms. The strongest example had fixed-schedule spectral radii of 0.9786 and 0.8344. Their two-cycle product had radius 2.3777. A guard limited the gap map norm to 0.95 without the next gap time. A proof bounds state differences for any nonnegative observed intervals under the fixed model and history assumptions. The guard changed two readers. It stopped large state growth in replay. It increased mean endpoint phase error from 61.21 to 62.29 degrees in a fixed 200 ms control. This is a numerical filter result on a reused clinical cohort. It does not establish true neural phase or stimulation benefit. The package contains code, exact decimal-matrix certificates, native voltage extracts, source checks, results, figures, and reproduction instructions.
We tested changing gap timing in 36 fixed SEEG readers from nine public rest records. Each reader had four fixed gap models. On a 16-member timing grid, 24 of 9,216 ordered two-map products were unstable although both member cycle maps were stable. The failures occurred in 11 readers from seven records. These are numerical state results, not brain instability. A new guard limits each gap-map operator norm to 0.95 without the next observed interval. With compatible models, exact completed sample counts, and shared voltage history independent of the state estimate, a proof gives contraction for arbitrary supported gap sequences and nonnegative observed intervals. All 144 guarded maps met the limit. On the primary mixed schedule, the guard raised mean gap-end phase error by 11.46 degrees relative to held voltage. All nine record means had more error. The descriptive 95 percent record bootstrap interval was 9.48 to 13.39 degrees. The reused cohort makes this an exploratory test. It does not show improved overall interface performance. The package preserves code, fixed models, selected voltage, source receipts, four figures, and reproduction commands. A second analysis matched all 115 numerical files exactly. Fresh source checks matched all 7,200,000 selected voltage values.
One fixed learned SEEG state reader had two stable cycle maps with spectral radii 0.978644 and 0.834426. Their alternating two-cycle product had spectral radius 2.377684. The maps used 100 ms simulated gaps and requested observed intervals of 28 and 62 ms. A search of 36 fixed readers found 99 such duration pairs in two readers. We added a gap-end operator norm guard that does not need the next observed interval. Under fixed weights, known gap length, and shared state-independent voltage history, its bound proves contraction of initial state differences for any observed interval. In nine reused public rest records, the guard reduced equal record mean phase error by 10.07 degrees against held voltage but increased it by 1.23 degrees against the original learned rule. Large phase errors remained. All 7.2 million selected voltage values matched fresh public source extracts. A separate full run reproduced all 14 numerical result files exactly. The package includes data, weights, code, proof, figures, source receipts, and instructions. The results concern a numerical filter state. They do not establish biological phase accuracy, actual artifact recovery, hardware performance, or stimulation benefit.
We tested public SEEG data from eight people in OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Each reader used eight contact pairs. It learned from early trials. One scale was fitted on middle trials. Later trials tested the readers. We compared scale fitting at a supplied 1 percent task rate with fitting at 50 percent followed by the same odds correction. The test used 506 trials and 1012 windows. Fitting at 1 percent reduced log loss in two people. Mean log loss was 0.04935, compared with 0.05196. The mean change was -0.00261. Its descriptive 95 percent person bootstrap interval was -0.00868 to 0.00071. One person drove the lower mean. Both methods had lower mean log loss than a constant 1 percent probability. The 1 percent method did not reduce mean Brier error below that constant. These reused, selected task windows do not establish command detection or a live BCI benefit. The package includes data, code, figures, source receipts, and checks.
We tested limits for the full recorded response after brain stimulation. Public SEEG data supplied 86 selected sites in eight epilepsy patients. Five earlier pulses selected each readout. Three separate later pulses fitted each set. The remaining 352 eligible pulses supplied the test. The window was 20 to 500 ms. A full rank set covered 77.7 percent with equal patient weight. A ball fitted to the calibration errors covered 39.1 percent. The paired gain was 38.6 percentage points, with a descriptive 95 percent patient interval of 34.7 to 43.2 points. The pooled full-set count was 265 of 352. The full set is larger by construction. Its mean radial extent in fixed directions was 1.415 times the calibration-error radius. This is not a volume estimate. Before-pulse coverage was similar, at 77.1 percent. Acceptance therefore does not establish an evoked neural response. The 75 percent marginal rank guarantee requires exchangeability of the three calibration vectors and one future vector. The data do not establish that assumption. The ball geometry and rank guarantee are prior methods. This study adds a three-pulse benchmark after separate readout selection. The package preserves code, exact waveform data, source hashes, event roles, every test decision, fitted parameters, three figures, and reproduction instructions.
We tested a short linear relation between recorded room sound and eight bipolar SEEG pairs in each of nine people. The data were OpenNeuro ds004703, version 1.1.0. We fitted a 0–10 ms waveform map on 54 early passages. We subtracted its predicted component and tested fixed 400 ms sound-amplitude readers on 100 later passage records. Mean MSE skill was 0.1385 before subtraction and 0.1406 after subtraction. Skill before minus skill after was -0.00214, with a descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval of -0.00730 to +0.00341. The exact sign-flip p value was 0.5430. Mean correlation was 0.3429 before and 0.3347 after. One person had a larger correlation loss, from 0.2293 to 0.1331. A known added zero-lag room waveform lost 99.988% of its energy on average. All 154 fresh EDF range hashes matched the cited source. Raw reader predictions matched the parent exactly. A full offline replay passed. The SCI edition retains fixed models, code, provenance, results, and figures; source recordings, audio, metadata, and derived input caches are linked but omitted. The tested subtraction caused little change in mean skill. It does not rule out other contamination or prove neural signal origin. This is a new subtraction analysis of previously tested listening records; it does not test brain stimulation. Source terms conflict: the saved dataset description says CC0, while its README states noncommercial and no-identification restrictions.
We tested synthetic linear voltage gains in 500 sample windows from eight public SEEG recordings. The readers used eight bipolar pairs and fixed log power contrasts. The test used 674 later trials. For each person, we measured the largest changed decision fraction across one-shaft ramps with endpoints 0.4 and 1.6. The planned exported-voltage test gave a mean of 43.1%, with a descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval of 37.2–48.1%. A post hoc control removed each window mean before gain. Its mean was 5.2%, with an interval of 4.0–6.8%. Every person had a reduction. Clean decisions stayed fixed. Constant gains changed no contrast decisions. Large exported offsets explain a signal processing term that remains when mean removal follows a changing gain. The package contains exact spectral replay data, raw audits, source hashes, fixed models, all scores, figures, and repeat code. These synthetic, offline tests do not establish a device fault rate, a live command benefit, or a stimulation benefit.
We tested whether one phase estimate can stay within 45 degrees at every possible pulse arrival sample. We used public OpenNeuro ds006065 version 1.0.0 rest data from seven anatomical SEEG pairs. The main reference was a 2 s offline theta filter. At each of 14,000 test times, we computed the exact smallest possible maximum circular error across assumed native delays from about 30 to 70 ms. Even with perfect future reference phase knowledge, 47.8% of times could not meet the limit. The descriptive person-bootstrap interval was 43.5% to 51.7%. Results were similar with 1 s and 3 s filters. Each person had a median allowed delay half width of 18 or 20 ms. This result is a bound for these filtered signals and assumed delay sets. It does not test a device, actual stimulation times, or a clinical effect. The package includes the proof, contact data, source hashes, reader and filter coefficients, phase arrays, results, three figures, code, and reproduction instructions.
We tested whether an online memory decoder used in RAM free recall (FR3) and categorized free recall (catFR3) reflected a slow state shared across a list, in addition to its per-word trigger. The decoder read SEEG or ECoG band power (8 Morlet frequencies, 3–180 Hz) during the 0–1366 ms interval after each word; output below the training median triggered a 500 ms stimulation train. We treated stimulated words as flagged and analyzed event and electrode files only (no iEEG signals). The analyzed files comprise 40 sessions; 38 sessions from 22 subjects met the requirement of at least 6 stimulation and 6 no-stimulation lists, yielding 399 stimulation lists. For each stimulation list, we related the flag fraction to residual recall, defined against recall at the same serial position in no-stimulation lists from the same session. Per-subject partial Spearman correlations removed session means and a linear list-number trend per session. The flag fraction did not predict recall of unflagged words (22 subjects; mean rho −0.049, 95% CI −0.170 to +0.073; sign-flip p = 0.45; within-session permutation p = 0.42); the SEEG subgroup was similar (16 subjects; rho −0.016, CI −0.165 to +0.130; p = 0.84; permutation p = 0.81). It also did not predict recall of flagged words (rho −0.045, CI −0.165 to +0.082; p = 0.50). Whole-list recall decreased as flag fraction increased (all subjects: rho −0.195, CI −0.324 to −0.057; p = 0.012; SEEG: rho −0.152, CI −0.300 to +0.010; p = 0.084), consistent with a composition effect from more low-recall flagged words rather than a detectable list-level decoder state. The inference about unflagged words assumes stimulation does not change recall of other words in the list. No classifier outputs were available, flag fraction is a coarse state read-out, and list estimates from 12 words are noisy; the confidence interval does not exclude a small effect (about rho −0.17 or weaker).
We tested rest, left-key, and right-key probability readers in eight public SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Each reader used the same eight bipolar pairs and 50 fitted parameters. It learned from early trials. We tested 674 later trials from the same recordings. The mean joint log loss was 0.9055 nat for one three-class reader and 0.9082 nat for a task reader followed by a key reader. The paired difference was -0.0027 nat. Its 95 percent person-bootstrap interval was -0.0106 to +0.0058 nat. Fixed checks changed the sign of the small mean difference. Task detection gave 98.6 percent of the two-head reader's mean gain over a constant reference. The key head added 0.0019 nat of mean gain, with an interval that included zero. We provide an exact task/key error decomposition, raw-byte checks, code, inputs, model states, all test probabilities, and four figures. The cohort and later trials were used in earlier work. These selected response-aligned windows do not establish live command control, transfer to a new day, or an effect of brain stimulation.
We tested whether a higher decoder score threshold only removes commands from a SEEG replay. We used public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2 and eight fixed patient decoders. The reference score threshold was zero. The higher threshold was the 99th percentile of calibration rest scores. Tests covered 112.31 minutes, 67,309 windows, and 816 later task responses. With a one-second waiting period, 1,033 of 1,153 higher-threshold commands were absent at exact reference times. The equal-patient mean was 89.4 percent. Its descriptive 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was 84.3 to 93.1 percent. With a 0.5-second matching tolerance, the mean unmatched fraction was 5.2 percent. Total command counts did not increase. We proved a one-to-one timing bound of less than one waiting period. We also proved that a gate after a fixed reference schedule can only remove its command times. Replay confirmed this subset rule. This gate reduced mean response detection from 23.8 to 7.1 percent. Mean outside-guard command rates fell from 7.8 to 1.4 per eligible minute. Response guards do not establish absent movement intent. We audited all continuous feature windows against pinned raw source ranges. The package preserves data, code, proofs, figures, results, source records, and reproduction instructions. This fixed-stream test measured no live control or stimulation effects.
Two command rules were tested on public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Eight people with epilepsy gave 816 later recorded responses. Both rules used an early SEEG reader and a separate early threshold. Each rule had a five-per-minute background limit and at least 80 percent ready background endpoints in calibration. A lower reset threshold detected 160 responses. One threshold detected 158. The mean gain with equal weight for each person was 0.22 percentage points. All extra hits came from one person. The descriptive paired bootstrap interval was 0.00 to 0.67 points. The paired sign-flip value was 1.00. This small reused cohort does not establish a general gain. Four people exceeded the early rate limit in the later scan under each rule. A ready time limit removed an almost always unavailable choice in one person. The package preserves code, features, source records, full results, checks, and three figures. This was an offline cued movement test. It did not test brain stimulation.
We tested a fixed 150 ms score confirmation rule for brain-computer interface outputs. The data came from eight patients with epilepsy in OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Each patient had a fixed decoder and early rest threshold. In the first 3-minute test, mean background outputs fell from 12.8 to 6.0 per minute. The mean paired change was -6.77 per minute. The exact patient sign-flip p value was 0.0078125. Mean keypress detection changed from 55.5% to 45.1%. Detection before keypress changed from 32.9% to 17.0%. A separate later 3-minute check gave 12.9 and 6.0 background outputs per minute. This check was added after the first result was known. It used the same patients and fixed rules. The package preserves two full decision grids, code, source versions and hashes, result tables, and four figures. All continuous inputs were checked from public raw ranges. Background is a defined task-log measure. The study does not test user intent, online control, a new day, or stimulation.
A continuous brain interface must control when it sends commands. We tested a fixed 200 ms confirmation rule on public SEEG from eight patients. The test used one three-minute segment per patient, fixed models, and early rest thresholds. Confirmation reduced mean background commands from 13.15 to 4.03 per minute. All eight patient rates fell. The paired mean change was -9.12 per minute; its exact sign-flip p value was 0.0078125. Mean keypress detection fell from 55.46% to 39.44%. A delay-only control left 12.71 background commands per minute. The package contains complete command and event records, fixed duration controls, four figures, and executable code. Fresh raw range checks covered all 28,704 test windows and matched every threshold decision. This evidence applies to short offline tests. Task logs define background; they do not verify absence of behavior. The work does not test online use or stimulation.