Across four archived AutoSci reports and fresh retrievals from three ds000030 source labels, all 126 corresponding control stop-signal event tables had matching SHA-256 hashes. This establishes event-table identity for the inspected files, not identity of complete releases or acquisition histories. Recalculation of the specified screens and three delay conventions reconciled the reported summaries: the all-control recorded-minus-hybrid contrast was 30.059523810 ms, while the legacy 102-control recorded-minus-all-LadderTime contrast was 27.849444959 ms. The difference decomposed into +0.439863445 ms from selection and -2.649942296 ms from convention within the legacy cohort. The 274 recorded-zero, positive-LadderTime STOP rows across 84 controls all had responses before LadderTime; this does not identify acoustic onset or show that a cue was delivered. The work is a scoped computational replication, not independent biological replication. Sparse runs, screening, and delay substitutions do not establish race-model validity, corrected SSRT, or individual reliability. Cue delivery, actual acoustic onset, and deployed task and converter versions remain unresolved.
Filters: arxiv: stat.OT (Other Statistics) ×
A separately written implementation was compared with an archived AutoSci analysis of the same OpenNeuro ds000030 observations. It reproduced all 266 participant rows, 8,512 STOP rows, failed-screen flags, estimates under three delay conventions, rank statistics, and both specified participant-bootstrap intervals within the archived display-rounding tolerances. Among 241 runs passing limited behavioral screens, recorded versus planned delays reversed 5,700 of 28,920 participant pairs (19.71%; Spearman 0.756208; Kendall tau-b 0.605809). With at least 50 ms separation under both conventions, 405 of 11,886 pairs reversed (3.41%). Mean recorded-minus-planned estimate shift was 31.078 ms (95% participant-bootstrap interval 26.139–36.124 ms). The shift equals the mean planned-minus-recorded delay; this arithmetic does not establish which convention measures auditory onset or stopping latency. The analysis is a same-data computational reproduction, not an independent biological replication. Each run has only 32 STOP trials, and the convenience sample, selection, omissions, fast responses, trigger failures, and incomplete race-model checks limit biological interpretation. Cue delivery, acoustic onset, and repeated-measurement reliability were not established.
In the 26-participant NYU Slow Flanker event files from OpenNeuro ds000102 snapshot 00001, the condition prefix in trial_type matched Stimulus on all 624 run-1 trials but differed on 304 of 624 run-2 trials (48.72%), across all participants. The source labels do not establish which encoding matches the stimuli presented. Among 1,230 correct trials with finite reaction time (RT) greater than zero, the equally weighted mean participant run-2 incongruent-minus-congruent RT contrast was 160.1 ms under trial_type and 24.9 ms under Stimulus. Their paired difference was 135.1 ms (participant-bootstrap 95% interval 104.2–170.4). Nine participants changed the sign of their run-2 score. The run-2 cost correlation between runs was 0.833 under trial_type and 0.399 under Stimulus; the paired difference in correlation was 0.434 (−0.047 to 0.632), including zero. These conditional results show substantial encoding sensitivity in this snapshot. They do not identify correct labels, establish a biological effect, estimate across-day reliability, or test prior imaging findings. Original source rows are preserved without repair.