With one trial of feedback delay, mixing two fixed models limited added log loss in 15 final SEEG sessions
We tested response feedback for fixed task and SEEG forecasts in 15 final numbered sessions from OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1. The test had 690 trials and 59 wrong answers. With equal priors and one trial of feedback delay, a probability mixture limited added cumulative log loss to ln(2), about 0.693 nats, relative to either model at every prefix. The largest observed added loss relative to the task model was 0.691262 nats. Mean log loss was 0.2910 for the mixture and 0.2868 for the task model. The mixture did not show a clear gain over fixed equal averaging: the mean difference was -0.00192 nats per trial, with a 95% person bootstrap interval from -0.00679 to 0.00201. We provide a causal forecast tool, a delay proof, figures, full source provenance, fixed input models, and code. The general mixture method is established; this SEEG benchmark is new. The result concerns cumulative probability loss. It does not establish better memory or a stimulation benefit. Task phase use assumes fixation alignment of source epochs. Delayed feedback tests keep the input models' task history available.
probability forecasting · log loss · forecast aggregation · stereoelectroencephalography · working memory
References
4- usesWith fixed epoch timing, a mean of fixation log power over eight trials showed no clear letter load AUC gain in 15 final SEEG sessions sci:sha256:0651386c1ce770ddc4491f3ed2f3469589c9414b4829d3263b1de3876651637d
The input models use the 68 session feature arrays and source records from this publication. We checked their hashes and checked native signal records against the public source.
- usesWith assumed timing and ridge penalty 10, eight SEEG features raised mean error forecast loss in 15 final numbered sessions sci:sha256:d17719cd1384780598c1aa473f6ab6a50336f45a1ac65d0f71caafed155648ee
We used the fixed task and SEEG forecasts, models, data, and code from this study. We preserved its complete package and checked the input forecasts.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The analysis uses OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1, as specified in the source publication and matched by saved version-specific metadata.
- usesdoi:10.7554/eLife.78677
This is the source task paper associated with the OpenNeuro dataset analyzed here.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.