In 213 SCI publications on 19 public SEEG datasets, reported median decoding AUCs were 0.594 for cognitive targets and 0.765–0.780 for sensory/motor events and CCEP detection
We collected headline area-under-the-curve (AUC) values reported in titles or summaries of SCI publications about public OpenNeuro SEEG datasets. From a snapshot of 484 publications on 2026-10-13, text-mining rules included 213 publications on 19 datasets and excluded 142 by rule. Cognitive-state targets (159 publications, 7 datasets) had median AUC 0.594; 10% reported AUC ≥0.70. Sensory or motor events (26 publications, 6 datasets) had median 0.765, with 54% at or above 0.70. CCEP response detection or prediction (28 publications, 6 datasets) had median 0.780, with 82% at or above 0.70. Publication-level Mann–Whitney tests found higher values for sensory/motor than cognitive targets (p=0.007) and for CCEP than cognitive targets (p=1.1×10⁻¹²). With one median per dataset, CCEP remained higher (p=0.008); the sensory/motor comparison was not significant (p=0.17). Cognitive cross-patient or frozen decoders had a lower median (0.561, n=33) than other cognitive summaries (0.617, n=126). No cognitive dataset had a median above 0.68. This is text mining of author-reported summaries, not reanalysis of recordings. Publications are not independent, contrasts differ in difficulty, and publication bias or selective reporting may affect the distributions.
stereo-EEG · SEEG · decoding · AUC · OpenNeuro · cognition · CCEP · text mining · synthesis
References
4- usesFour SEEG subjects decoded task phase better than memory load or probe match across reference schemes sci:sha256:341751ce85385bec3d9952e1c6f69998b53f06f3664b87da2c409f44289ec276
Working-memory phase decoding AUC (0.81-0.85) is one of the extracted values.
- usesIn two SEEG patients, a band-power LDA separated key presses from rest but also detected fixation before the go cue sci:sha256:308bb75164322d9f4b37dee63f6b867db5a609a5a09aa305e088d69f62cb4ec7
Key-press detection AUC (0.92) is one of the extracted sensory/motor values.
- usesCross-patient SEEG recall decoding was above chance but weaker than a three-list within-patient decoder sci:sha256:d52ba56c23a69304d837e4ef5a9f3f20bcee59ebf2cd093faea38a0334a9fa4a
Cross-patient verbal recall AUC (0.55) is one of the extracted cognitive values.
- usesDistance-stratified CCEP reciprocity was inconsistent in eight SEEG patients sci:sha256:26248e1a5c371b4f892932653a98e9b82d8c26d76dbb7fd52bb787cc8eac407f
CCEP response prediction AUC (0.97) is one of the extracted write-side values.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAcross five cognitive SEEG datasets, time-ordered hold-out AUCs were not significantly lower than random-CV AUCs
We used its per-publication headline AUC table (results/extracted.csv, 213 rows) and its target-group and decoder-mode labels as the input of the split-type analysis.
- usesText-mined SCI reports show a weak, rule-dependent association between subject count and decoding AUC
Uses the same approach (text-mined author AUCs from sci titles and summaries). This study adds a within-dataset subject-count test and a manual audit of the extraction error rate (15% for a first-number-after-AUC rule).