sciscape Publications
← All publications

Removal of linear trends reduced the geometric mean variance ratio for CSV-listed plants from 1.33 to 1.07 in 35 Cedar Creek 16-species plots, 2010–2021

We tested net covariance of planted species biomass in the later harvests of the Cedar Creek Biodiversity II experiment. The planned primary measure used species with a planted-membership flag in the source CSV. We rebuilt species-sorted samples for 154 plots in 2010–2021. For each plot, R is total biomass variance divided by the sum of species variances. R below one means negative net covariance. In 35 plots with 16 planted species, the geometric mean R was 1.329 (95% plot-bootstrap interval 1.171–1.511). After removal of separate species linear trends, it was 1.071 (0.934–1.226). A joint plot-and-year-block interval was 0.712–1.356. A later check included extra plants from the metadata planting lists. It gave R = 1.214 (1.066–1.380) before trend removal and 0.993 (0.855–1.157) after it. Thus, both definitions showed positive net covariance in raw values, while the residual sign was unresolved. Mean standard synchrony was 0.194, above its zero-covariance reference of 0.136. Low synchrony alone did not show net compensation. Linear trends supplied 64.6% of the equal-plot mean raw net covariance. This is a descriptive decomposition, not a causal result. The result concerns planted species at one managed site and is sensitive to the time window. The package preserves raw data, source provenance, code, figures, all planned checks and an independent numerical reconstruction.

biodiversity · grassland · species covariance · variance ratio · synchrony · Cedar Creek · reproducibility

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

11
  1. usesdoi:10.6073/pasta/87b179ac496a0343e6860b19f33158fc

    Source biomass data, release knb-lter-cdr.273.12.

  2. doi:10.1038/nature04742

    The first-decade study found stability effects without a covariance effect.

  3. usesdoi:10.2307/1938071

    Established variance-ratio measure.

  4. usesdoi:10.1086/589746

    Standard species synchrony measure and ecological limits of an independence reference.

  5. doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0647-7

    Prior synthesis of diversity, biomass asynchrony and stability.

  6. usesCedar Creek e120, 1997–2021: the richness effect on total live biomass stopped increasing after about 2005, but the effect on planted-species biomass continued to increase sci:sha256:6bc19f30a8ffdf3c8c7098f9e84c102f63c16e650fd3f65e84c7ef82d0da36b4

    Retained source snapshot and harvest convention; prior analysis of biomass richness effects.

  7. Cedar Creek plots with more planted species had lower mean annual log biomass loss and higher mass loss in 2011–2021 sci:sha256:f5f19fb12897fb117912d465d27e9e5e19bc7b040e1c4830e95147a90a5165af

    Prior comparison of annual biomass loss measures using the same release.

  8. Species abundances in 2,124 BioTIME 2.0 local assemblages vary together at 2- to 10-year timescales; compensatory dynamics are not more frequent than the null rate sci:sha256:4fbfb7af86e56b3e4eef5c1ae08d129cc15b304dd48a0cacf5452e8de22a80f3

    Prior variance-ratio analysis of BioTIME and discussion of trends and shared observation effects.

  9. Recorded total biomass had a weaker richness–stability relation than biomass of listed plants at Cedar Creek in 2010–2021 sci:sha256:d3df437aed37dad0617a480bbc60eb7afc0241d633b2261310932573143fc9b9

    Its planting-record audit prompted the added union and EML-list checks.

  10. C4 grass share rose while legume mass fell in 35 Cedar Creek plots assigned 16 species, 2001–2005 versus 2017–2021 sci:sha256:e4a5bf496fe242d0952e43e8cec4fe193ffba8462b56db3c81c6440e304e4918

    Recent species composition results for the same 35 high-richness plots.

  11. Strip differences account for 47% of the richness slope in relative biomass variance in 154 Cedar Creek plots, 2011–2021 sci:sha256:865b56216b20adfcba6f3e8d883690c12575fd2e14e17704a3a70b88803c3d74

    Recent evidence that spatial strip variation affects temporal variance measures.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.