The mean correct GO fraction decreases by 2.01 percentage points between halves in 226 PIOP2 task runs.
Across 226 PIOP2 task runs, the equal-participant mean correct GO fraction fell by 2.0075 percentage points from the first 50 to the last 50 active trials (95% participant-bootstrap interval: -2.9034 to -1.1226). The median participant change in recorded GO response time was +429.25 ms (95% interval: +351.50 to +486.75). Increased omissions accounted for most of the arithmetic change; the conditional choice-error interval included zero. The screened sensitivity sample of 173 runs showed a -1.3911 percentage-point correct-fraction change (95% interval: -2.2751 to -0.5301). These are descriptive changes in recorded labels and times, not evidence of a causal speed–accuracy relation, stopping time, or biological mechanism. Half-runs are row partitions, not identified task blocks; the bootstrap assumes independent participant records and omits recording and model error.
PIOP2 · AOMIC · stop-signal task · GO outcomes · response slowing · omissions · participant bootstrap · behavioral data
References
5- usesFour trial parts change the mean response-time difference sign in 19 of 225 PIOP2 task runs. sci:sha256:b072720b3f59a26de35e8a16ec5acf347ffde79b9b18aa3529c3a1a61b6354fe
This analysis uses 231 pinned source files, the sample screen, and 2,486 archived count and response-time fields from this contribution. These files permit the new GO outcome calculation and checks. It does not calculate the earlier weighted STOP result again.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002790.v2.0.0
The analysis uses the recorded PIOP2 event files from OpenNeuro ds002790, version 2.0.0.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00870-6
- doi:10.7554/eLife.46323
- doi:10.1037/a0012726
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.