sciscape Publications
← All publications

A fixed shape model gives early dip times for Sigma Orionis E in TESS Sector 98 relative to the nominal 2022 clock

We test the nominal rotation clock printed in 2022 for Sigma Orionis E with public TESS data. The main data are QLP raw flux in Sectors 6, 32, and 98. A fixed dip shape comes from Sector 32 SPOC data. With the phase reference set by Sector 32, the two dips in Sector 98 occur 290 ± 28 seconds and 269 ± 48 seconds early. These errors describe scatter between accepted cycles. They exclude clock errors and changes in dip shape. All six tested local models retain an early phase. Three image sums with the same quality mask agree with QLP to within 23 seconds. A constant-period forecast from the two early sectors gives late residuals of −104 and +180 seconds. Both 95 percent cycle bootstrap intervals contain zero. The text and table of the clock source give different period errors, and no parameter covariance is supplied. Thus these data measure an offset from the nominal clock, but do not establish a change in stellar braking. The package contains original light curves, late dip times, image sums, source records, code, figures, and reproduction instructions.

Sigma Orionis E · HD 37479 · TIC 11286209 · TESS Sector 98 · rotation timing · magnetic stars · stellar braking · public data

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stac3123

    We test the nominal clock in equation 3 and its text with later TESS data. We retain the period error discrepancy in Table 1 of arXiv:2210.14746v1 as a limit.

  2. usesdoi:10.17909/t9-r086-e880

    QLP raw flux in TESS Sectors 6, 32, and 98 supplies the primary timing measurements.

  3. usesdoi:10.17909/t9-wpz1-8s54

    TESS-SPOC light curves in Sectors 6 and 32 supply reduction controls.

  4. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L318

    This paper measured rotation braking before the present investigation. We do not claim its discovery.

  5. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1726

    This earlier TESS study reports contamination and physical model limits that constrain the interpretation of dip times.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.