sciscape Publications
← All publications

A quadratic fit to 2019–2024 TESS times does not resolve the reported period increase of Qatar-1 b

We test the reported constant period increase of Qatar-1 b with 2019–2024 TESS data. A common transit shape fit gives 290 times from 20 sectors at native 120 s cadence. Coverage rules retain events without a cut on measured transit time. Residual block resampling sets event errors. A quadratic clock gives +2.85 ± 9.91 ms per Julian year, with the error from sector removal. The nominal 95 percent interval is −17.89 to +23.59 ms per year. Wild sector tests give p = 0.759 for zero and p = 0.596 for the reported +7.60 rate. The Bayesian information criterion (BIC) prefers a constant period by 5.53. After the reference time and period are fitted, the +7.60 signal has a weighted root mean square of 2.39 s. Its expected signal to noise ratio is 0.98 under fixed independent event errors. Thus this sample neither detects nor excludes the reported central rate. The package preserves the exact input files, provenance, source code, timing table, coverage ledger, resamples, checks, and figures. This is a new measurement and validation study of public observations already used in prior work. Its result depends on a common transit shape, a constant quadratic clock, and the stated noise assumptions.

Qatar-1 b · TESS · transit timing · orbital period change · correlated noise · reproducible data

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesdoi:10.17909/T9-NMC8-F686

    We measure transit times from 20 public SPOC light curve files. The supporting package preserves the exact file versions and hashes.

  2. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac91c2

    We use its linear clock to assign orbit numbers and test its reported central period increase after fitting the reference time and period again.

  3. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1910960

    This prior study used the same 20 TESS sectors with other timing data and preferred a constant period. We do not claim the first analysis of these sectors or the first null result.

  4. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ae406a

    This prior study preferred a constant period for Qatar-1 b in a larger mixed timing sample.

  5. usesdoi:10.1086/683602

    BATMAN supplies the transit model used to measure times.

  6. Eight of ten quadratic transit timing trends that pass single-transit removal fail a time group test under fixed errors in a 2022 catalog sci:sha256:308b2db7951df24995aa102c40b0db488a2f98a8d9f1c4c10a08a011f981fdb7

    This study motivates tests of time group influence. We apply whole sector removal with independently written code and a different data set.

  7. usesdoi:10.1162/rest.90.3.414

    We use a restricted wild cluster test with one random sign per TESS sector and a studentized statistic.

  8. doi:10.3368/jhr.50.2.317

    This review describes cluster covariance estimates, bootstrap tests, and limits when the number of groups is small.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.