sciscape Publications
← All publications

TESS shows three 1 % transits of TIC 450075744 at P = 29.664 d, not at its 5.114 d Gaia DR3 SB1 period; centroids exclude the 9 arcsec neighbour; with FLAME values the 3.3 h transit needs e >= 0.55

Gaia DR3 gives a single-lined spectroscopic (SB1) orbit with P = 5.114 d and m2 sin i = 0.058 Msun for the G-type star TIC 450075744 (Gaia DR3 3288772766261941376, G = 12.2). TESS shows no transit at this period. TESS shows three transit-like dips of 0.9 % to 1.2 % depth instead: one in sector 5 (2018) and two in sector 98 (2025). The dips agree with one linear ephemeris, P = 29.664290 +- 0.000015 d, with timing residuals below 1 min. No dip occurs at the observed epochs of P/k (k = 2 to 12). The two sector-98 dips have the same depth, thus they are not a primary and a secondary eclipse of a 59.3 d binary. The flat-bottomed shape excludes an eclipsed star more than 0.97 mag fainter than the target. The flux centroids during the dips move toward the target (p = 0.11) and not toward the 9 arcsec neighbour (p = 1e-64). If the target is the eclipsed star, the transiting body has R = 1.09 to 1.16 R_Jup (a giant planet, a brown dwarf or a very-low-mass star). The 3.3 h transit needs a stellar density of 6.65 rho_sun in a circular orbit (3 sigma: >= 3.69), but the Gaia FLAME density is 0.58 rho_sun. Thus the orbit must be eccentric, with e >= 0.55 (3 sigma). A denser eclipsed star at the same distance is too faint. A 5.114 d companion and an eccentric 29.664 d body cannot both orbit the target in a stable configuration (Mardling & Aarseth 2001: a_out/a_in >= 8.7 is necessary; the actual ratio is 3.3). Simulated RV sets at the 51 Gaia field-of-view transits of the star gave the Gaia period for 0 of 200 circular 29.664 d orbits and for 5 of 4200 (0.1 %) eccentric orbits. This periodogram test is only a proxy for the Gaia pipeline. Thus the TESS dips and the Gaia SB1 orbit do not agree: the Gaia period is wrong, the Gaia orbit is spurious, or the system has a configuration that we did not test. On 2026-10-23 the star was not a TOI or CTOI. We give the next transit times (first: BJD_TDB 2461355.4210 +- 0.0007) and the expected RV amplitudes (0.87 km/s for 13 M_Jup). The package contains the TESS light curves, the code, the derived results and the download scripts.

TESS · Gaia DR3 · single-lined spectroscopic binary · transit candidate · TIC 450075744 · eccentric orbit · centroid test · blend test · hierarchical triple stability · brown dwarf · giant planet · period alias · QLP · TESS-SPOC

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

15
  1. supportsGaia DR3 SB1 orbits predict eclipse times with errors 1.45 times too small and 2.8% gross outliers, in a test with 1582 Gaia and 416 TESS eclipsing binaries of period mostly below 10 d sci:sha256:dd865fb0fe9055c98a3460d9be2bbf502e8b89f6a76ac3e6eb991affe46753d7

    That work found that Gaia DR3 SB1 orbits can have errors and gross outliers. Our target is an SB1 star where the TESS transit period (29.664 d) does not agree with the Gaia SB1 period (5.114 d).

  2. supportsGaia eclipse periods disagree with 32 of 39 SB1 entries flagged by a detached-star test in a 1,643-source sample sci:sha256:6ce1fde432bc3216b9e2a416e8b8e9b19a6fe0263e063e4bb571d6a9792b2347

    That work found that Gaia periods disagree with many flagged SB1 entries. Our target is one more SB1 entry where the TESS period does not agree with the Gaia SB1 period.

  3. usesdoi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e

    We use the QLP light curves of sectors 5 and 98.

  4. usesdoi:10.3847/2515-5172/abc9b3

    We use the TESS-SPOC light curve of sector 5 to check the sector-5 dip.

  5. usesdoi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    We use TESS data.

  6. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

    We use data of the Gaia mission.

  7. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    We use the Gaia DR3 catalogue (astrometry, photometry and neighbours).

  8. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243782

    We use the Gaia DR3 SB1 orbit of the target from nss_two_body_orbit.

  9. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243688

    We use the FLAME mass and radius of the target to get the stellar density.

  10. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467

    We use the TIC 8 identifiers and the TESS magnitudes.

  11. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629705

    We use the TESS limb-darkening coefficients for the transit model.

  12. usesdoi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab322d

    We use the transit-shape test of an eclipsed fainter star (blend limit).

  13. usesdoi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03974.x

    We use the stability criterion of hierarchical triples.

  14. usesdoi:10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/120

    We compare our stability result with this criterion for planets.

  15. usesdoi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    We use the dwarf sequence to test a dense eclipsed star at the same distance.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.