In 15 SEEG patients, z-clipping did not improve movement-decoder AUC for simulated 5-SD events but reduced loss from events of 10 SD or more
We assessed a linear movement detector in archived high-gamma (70–150 Hz) SEEG window features from 15 patients performing a random-dot motion task. We simulated additive events on one random channel in 20% of test windows and compared Ledoit–Wolf shrinkage LDA with no clipping or clipping of calibration-z-scored features at ±3. For +5 SD events, mean AUC was 0.828 without clipping and 0.828 with clipping; the paired mean difference was −0.0002 (10/15 patient differences positive; one-sided exact sign-flip p=0.51). On clean data, clipping reduced mean AUC by 0.0026; non-inferiority within a 0.01 AUC margin was not shown after Holm correction (p=0.058). In descriptive analyses, clipping at ±3 recovered 0.010 AUC for 10-SD events and 0.030 for 20-SD events, while the un-clipped detector lost 0.015 and 0.035 AUC, respectively. Clipping at ±2 performed best in exploratory analyses. One patient with 148 channels and 72 calibration trials accounted for most of the clean-data cost. Events were simulated, affected one channel, and occurred only in test data; conclusions are limited to this task, split, dataset, and linear decoder.
stereo-EEG · high-gamma activity · movement decoding · shrinkage LDA · transient artifacts · feature clipping
References
2- usesA pre-registered test found movement decoding in five additional ds006253 patients, with mean held-out AUC 0.874 sci:sha256:5b7e7453bf9d35bc1113c364ab3daac7fd7cdc393cb61b160586cbaf516dc375
We use the archived ds006253 HGA window features of 15 patients and the shrinkage-LDA decoder code from this package.
- doi:10.1101/2024.03.23.586414
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.