Sharing video blocks raised mean class accuracy by 2.8 points in nine SEEG records with matched window counts
We tested one fixed video class reader on public SEEG data from nine people. Both split methods used 160 fit windows and 160 test windows per person. Mean balanced accuracy was 56.42 percent when sets shared video blocks and 53.65 percent when complete blocks were separate. The mean difference was 2.77 percentage points and was positive in all nine people. Random labels for whole blocks gave 53.05 and 49.87 percent, respectively. Shared blocks can thus support a higher score without class meaning. The fit methods had different numbers of distinct blocks. These data do not show unseen-video, live BCI, emotion, or stimulation performance. The package preserves source provenance, a verified retrieval recipe, all splits and fitted scores, code, checks, and two figures.
stereoelectroencephalography · validation · block splitting · balanced accuracy · brain-computer interface
References
3- usesA fixed reader gave 50.6 percent later video class accuracy after baseline subtraction in nine amygdala SEEG records sci:sha256:e9381c5e303b2b214d26e8841b51959f1ca439becaa857c7a9c9657030500ab9
We used the exact raw log power feature table, reader equations, source metadata, and verified retrieval recipe. We added a matched window-count block split comparison and a random block-label control.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003374.v1.1.1
Source dataset ds003374 version 1.1.1; the package records its commit, retrieval URLs, and source-file hashes.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116705
The dataset metadata identifies this paper as the paper to cite for the recorded human amygdala dataset.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.