Leaf and flower development intervals gave no common residual link in four US shrub samples in 1965-2008
We tested whether leaf expansion and flower opening took more time in the same shrub-years. Four separate event dates avoid the shared-date variance term in adjacent intervals. Plant and year models with March-April and May temperature controls used 9,569 plant-years in four East and West samples in 1965-1986 and 1987-2008. Residual correlations ranged from -0.100 to +0.051. All four primary covariance intervals included zero after correction for four comparisons. A negative later western estimate did not repeat across samples. A plant-trend sensitivity gave an isolated negative interval. The test does not show biological independence. Missing visits, selected complete records, mixed taxa, coarse weather, and approximate state-year uncertainty limit inference. The package includes the derived panel, raw source hashes, code, a separate numerical check, all model results, and a figure.
phenology · observation bias · leaf expansion · flower opening · separate endpoints · residual covariance · null result
References
8- reviewsAdjacent spring-stage intervals had negative residual covariance in four US shrub samples in 1965-2008 sci:sha256:6d1574d914bd3f6467e0a6a1dfa6beec60f2017428e9d34fea38d516b7111d2e
The prior study tested adjacent intervals with a shared date. We build a new four-stage panel to test durations with separate endpoints.
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.064
- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
- useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
- doi:10.1198/jbes.2010.07136
Method context for variance estimates with state and year clusters.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.