Equal group weights gave no clear mean AUC gain in 19 offline SEEG tests with eight pairs and penalty 10
We tested equal fit weights for four direction and choice groups in public MetaRDK SEEG data. Each reader used eight bipolar pairs and fixed slope penalty 10. The primary window was 50 to 450 ms after movement onset. The primary score averaged choice AUC on correct and error trials. Nineteen people supplied 1,677 later test trials, including 459 task errors. The mean score was 0.569 with equal choice-label weights and 0.556 with equal four-group weights. The paired change was -0.012, with descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval [-0.041, +0.017]. The exact sign-flip p value was 0.432 under independent-person and sign-symmetric null assumptions. We also proved that any fixed score based only on binary direction gives primary score 0.5. Independent fits and AUC checks passed. Nine numerical files replayed exactly. Fresh source metadata matched, and a complete sub-04 source rebuild matched all seven arrays. The package includes code, compact data, frozen models, predictions, three figures, and retrieval recipes. This exploratory cohort reuse does not establish causal timing, a live interface, or stimulation effects.
SEEG · brain-computer interface · choice decoding · AUC · class weighting · MetaRDK
References
3- usesOffline SEEG readers with eight contact pairs and penalty 10 gave mean choice AUC 0.526 across opposite cues in 19 MetaRDK participants sci:sha256:c22d122d956476b6b42bf2d4ff09d54b02692d4e2c7e7005a613581a561a487f
We reuse all 21 compact SEEG inputs, extraction audits, source metadata, contact and trial rules, chronological splits, helper functions, and source retrieval code. We test new fit weights and an equal correctness-group AUC endpoint. The same cohort is reused; this is not an independent replication.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006253.v1.0.3
Source data: MetaRDK, OpenNeuro ds006253 version 1.0.3. The publication uses the pinned supplied derivative and archived compact features.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/s41467-025-61744-8
Source paper for the experiment and preprocessing description cited in the publication; the paper is not redistributed.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Two controlled AUC scores gave opposite SEEG reader rankings in two of 19 people before movement with eight contact pairs and penalty 10
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We reproduce all 190 overlapping class and cell weight readers. Trials and contacts match exactly. The largest coefficient error is 3.990e-16. We credit its weight-rule proof and accuracy-conditioned cue control. We add an explicit comparison of the two controlled AUC scores and their four-group identity.