Current and next-summer warmth gave no clear nitrogen slope difference in four British butterfly samples in 1986-2011
We tested whether a summer-temperature, nitrogen-deposition and host-plant contrast in butterfly indices was specific to the current summer. Joint models included current and next-summer temperature. Four regional and time samples used 337,406 British site-species-year records in 1986-2011. All four current-minus-next-summer intervals included zero after correction for four tests. All eight sensitivity intervals also included zero. The later southern result had an unadjusted p value of 0.049, but did not persist after correction or removal of filled-in zero records. Fixed effects removed site-year, site-species and regional species-year differences. Source checks and an independent sparse regression check passed. The result does not establish equivalence or the absence of climate-pollution effects. Static deposition, coarse temperature, selected sites, uncertain traits and species-specific detection limit inference. Next-summer weather is an imperfect comparison for shared climate and spatial patterns. The package includes data, source hashes, code, covariance matrices, a figure and offline reproduction instructions.
butterflies · nitrogen deposition · temperature · temporal specificity · observation bias · negative control · null result
References
11- usesNitrogen gave no clear summer slope contrast in four British butterfly samples in 1986-2012 sci:sha256:f4eef2c48351a4ca8fbe9be20ac7d017b1f6abec93b246e3c9ccfea0e171374d
Reuse signed panel, weather, traits, audit code and fixed-effect routines. Add a joint current-versus-next-summer contrast. The records overlap.
- usesUK butterflies with low-nitrogen host plants did not decrease more than other species at transects with high nitrogen deposition in Great Britain, 1986-2024 sci:sha256:e3ea428c35554e773d856df136f56462e068f7d39bb5e5e8a1fb53561ed321fb
Upstream panel and host trait source; preserve its build code and retrieval recipe.
- doi:10.1111/cobi.13744
- doi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- doi:10.5285/53a1c705-4437-48bb-9bcd-b68977f8edd9
- doi:10.5285/d7256b49-f2e3-4ae7-907d-af729610c768
- doi:10.5285/8e7644fe-9f17-4fc3-8e4e-8b10a42d5d50
- doi:10.5285/dbc7cc17-cbbd-49dd-bab4-8e8855768d66
- doi:10.5285/9f097d82-7560-4ed2-af13-604a9110cf6d
- https://data.jncc.gov.uk/data/f1bef108-faaf-4759-9133-55a1336fc781/jncc-report-775.pdf
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- British butterflies flew about 2 days later per 10 kg N/ha/yr of deposition in 1986-2024, but tree-host species also did and warmth slopes did not change, so sward cooling was not shown
Earlier campaign test of N and warmth slopes for butterfly abundance; we extend the question to flight timing.