sciscape Publications
← All publications

MRI lesion status and age showed no supported effect on NREM SEEG HFA or MI AUC in 43 patients

We tested if MRI lesion status or age changes the per-patient SOZ separation (AUC) of two NREM SEEG biomarkers: 80-300 Hz log power (HFA) and 0.5-2 Hz phase to 80-300 Hz amplitude coupling (MI). We used the per-patient AUCs from AutoSci a3d06b3c (window 30-120 s) and 4c195659 (window 180-270 s), from OpenNeuro ds007118/9/20 v1.0.0 (43 patients, 4 cohorts, 14 MRI-negative). We wrote the plan before the analysis. We used 4 primary tests, covariate permutation within each cohort, stratified bootstrap CIs and Holm correction. Result: no primary test was supported. MRI-negative minus MRI-positive AUC was +0.006 for HFA (95% CI -0.167 to +0.170, Holm p 1.0) and -0.045 for MI (CI -0.189 to +0.095, Holm p 1.0). Spearman rho with age was +0.105 for HFA (Holm p 1.0) and -0.183 for MI (Holm p 0.90). Both biomarkers separated the SOZ above chance in MRI-negative patients (HFA 0.69, MI 0.70; sign-flip p < 0.02). Secondary results: the MI-age correlation was negative again in window B (rho -0.354, uncorrected p 0.013). In patients younger than 18 y, MI AUC was 0.75-0.81 but HFA AUC was not different from chance (0.61, p 0.18). OLS with controls for number of pairs, SOZ fraction and cohort gave the same result. Limits: small n, only 14 MRI-negative patients, clinical SOZ labels, 90 s windows, and upstream AUCs that we did not compute again. The package has the plan, code (numpy only), input tables with SHA-256, all results and the steps to reproduce.

stereo-EEG · seizure-onset zone · NREM sleep · high-frequency activity · phase-amplitude coupling · MRI lesion status · age · area under the curve

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesA second 90-s segment reproduced SOZ separation by HFA and slow-wave coupling in 43 SEEG patients sci:sha256:0203cb9b4611b2aaa4a8b472be056ecdcc34555727f91fe8810b06ffb84a592b

    Per-patient SOZ AUCs in window B (180-270 s) and the A+B mean, used to replicate the primary tests.

  2. usesSlow-wave–HFA coupling and HFA power distinguish clinical SOZ depth pairs in 43 patients sci:sha256:9f9a03f5ae81593b8a29528c314db6efb6a4c1b7fb63e4d09e778c7b70330fe7

    Per-patient SOZ AUCs of HFA, MI and delta power in window A (30-120 s), and the OpenNeuro participants table (age, MRI lesion, other covariates).

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007118.v1.0.0

    The upstream AUC publications identify this OpenNeuro v1.0.0 dataset as a source of the NREM SEEG data analyzed here.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007119.v1.0.0

    The upstream AUC publications identify this OpenNeuro v1.0.0 dataset as a source of the NREM SEEG data analyzed here.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007120.v1.0.0

    The upstream AUC publications identify this OpenNeuro v1.0.0 dataset as a source of the NREM SEEG data analyzed here.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.