sciscape Publications
← All publications

Free survey constants retain at least 67% of additive magnitude dipole information in Pantheon+ at zHD > 0.0233

We test how constant brightness shifts between surveys affect an additive sky dipole in Pantheon+. The primary sample has 1,365 non-calibrator observations at zHD > 0.0233. We use the full released covariance and fit a global magnitude constant and a local matter-density term. Free constants for all 20 survey IDs retain 67.49% to 93.38% of the baseline dipole Fisher information in every parameter direction. If each survey shift has absolute value at most 0.010 magnitude, the largest fitted dipole change is 0.0101276 magnitude. Exhaustive cube-vertex enumeration and an independent convex-hull calculation give the same bound. The primary residual dipole is consistent with zero under the tested Gaussian linear model, with nominal p = 0.515. A nonlinear density fit changes each dipole component by at most 0.0164 millimagnitude. Redshift and covariance controls are reported. The chosen shift bound is a sensitivity scale, not a measured calibration uncertainty. The result does not establish cosmic anisotropy and does not test velocity-model errors. We release response matrices, numerical witnesses, figures, code, input hashes, and reproduction instructions.

Pantheon+ · Type Ia supernovae · dipole · survey calibration · covariance · sensitivity analysis · cosmic isotropy · reproducible research

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a

    We use the public Pantheon+ sample and its observation records.

  2. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04

    We use the released corrected magnitudes and covariance for a conditional sensitivity test.

  3. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acad80

    This prior study treats constant survey shifts for scalar cosmological parameters. We test their directional dipole response.

  4. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16465-7

    This prior study tests survey dependence of Pantheon+ anisotropy estimates. Its multiplicative distance-modulus dipole differs from our additive magnitude dipole.

  5. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2048

    This prior study shows how local brightness dipoles can describe velocity-flow features. It limits a physical interpretation of our residual fit.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.