Two article rules gave different common input calls for 9 of 117 mouse entorhinal pairs

We tested whether two rules stated in one article preserve the same common input calls and spatial reach. We used all 117 recorded cell pairs from the widefield mouse entorhinal assay of Huang and colleagues. The main prose gave 48 calls. The figure captions gave 41. Nine pairs changed call. The largest called separation changed from 510.5 to 468 micrometres in one of four groups and stayed the same in the other three. All 117 labels and 351 numerical values matched the released group scripts exactly. A separate test used four linear distance models without a call threshold. Test recording dates were excluded from fitting. Pooled squared error was 22.1% lower than for group means. A date resample with fits repeated gave a central 95% range from -10.7% to +33.4%, so this observed gain was not clear across resamples. Animal IDs were unavailable. Common input calls are assay decisions, not direct synapse measurements. The package supplies a verified benchmark, explicit rules, source provenance, code, figures and an offline repeat. The result supports preservation of detection rules with functional maps. It does not test the source study's separate focal stimulation or morphology evidence.

functional connectivity · medial entorhinal cortex · common input · spatial organization · reproducibility · threshold sensitivity