sciscape Publications
← All publications

Earlier hippocampal change gave an uncertain 2.2 percent error reduction in one 70-person DLBS delayed recall test with linear models and known visit intervals

We tested whether hippocampal volume change at the first two DLBS visits improves delayed word recall prediction at the third visit. We fixed the rules before computing new scores. We recovered the correct memory file from release 1.2.0 and checked the subject join to release 1.3.0 brain data. The sample had 173 people: 103 trained the linear models and 70 tested them. The baseline used prior recall, age, sex, education, current hippocampal volume, head volume, and visit intervals. Adding annual log volume change reduced test mean squared error from 3.011661 to 2.946119 words squared, a 2.176 percent gain. The paired 95 percent interval was -2.175 to 6.159 percent with trained models fixed. An interval that also refit the models was -13.497 to 9.507 percent. The result leaves added prediction value uncertain for this rule and sample. All eight planned supporting checks are reported. The package includes source data, pinned hashes, code, the selection ledger, predictions, resampling draws, and figures. Independent source and QR checks passed. All 21 numerical files matched after fresh source retrieval. This offline test assumes the recorded future return interval and does not establish a neural cause or clinical use.

hippocampal volume · delayed recall · memory prediction · longitudinal MRI · Dallas Lifespan Brain Study

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

3
  1. usesEarlier hippocampal change gave an uncertain 5.5 percent reduction in squared prediction error in one 88-person DLBS test sci:sha256:57c5d33f817d6189f6828bcfd55e2c5d7f82323d5b9948db29a426a325713c2f

    We used its archived structural workbook, participant table, dictionary, and source field definitions. The present test predicts delayed recall.

  2. usesThe DLBS 1.3.0 episodic memory file is an exact copy of its working memory file sci:sha256:d4e897faf22db63d50317fe5e4c07c24d261a4ac740c4e9ef07ca37f0c23e474

    We used its recovered release 1.2.0 memory file and adapted its OOXML reader. Its audit prevented use of the wrong release 1.3.0 workbook.

  3. doi:10.1038/s41597-025-04847-7

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.