sciscape Publications
← All publications

Gains from other stimulation sites increased normalized 20 to 500 ms SEEG forecast error relative to local gains in eight recordings

A gain is a number that scales a response template. We tested whether gains can transfer between stimulation sites in public SEEG data. We used OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 and readouts selected from electrode metadata. Each forecast used the first five pulses at its target site. The transferred gain used five-pulse data from other sites at the same recording pair in the same person. All current settings at the target site were excluded. There were eight people, 314 stimulation sites, 317 conditions, and 1,183 condition–readout cases. For the 20 to 500 ms window, transfer increased normalized forecast error by a mean 1.86% relative to local gains. Error increased in all eight people. The descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was 1.16% to 2.52%. The increase remained with source quality filters. The raw squared-error increase was 16.09%. Transfer still reduced normalized error by 7.30% relative to the unscaled mean. Its mean skill relative to zero was 7.10%, compared with 8.75% for local gains. A fresh raw rebuild used 192 hashed MEF files. It reproduced all saved inputs exactly. The package contains the plan, four figures, code, scores, source data products, and a raw retrieval recipe. This is an extension of a reused clinical cohort. It does not test a new person, fewer target pulses, or an online stimulation schedule.

stereoelectroencephalography · electrical stimulation · forecast error · gain transfer · calibration

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesA shared site scale gave a mean 0.93% error increase for 20 to 500 ms SEEG responses after five-pulse calibration in eight patients sci:sha256:5e40376589652ef208303520c3e6236c3bc2343041f1e1be7c8d5a1ea02c9ac6

    Its shared site and person gain tests defined the prior method and showed the need to test site specificity. Our new test omits the full target stimulation site and matches the recording pair in a broader metadata-selected cohort. The people overlap, so this is not independent biological confirmation.

  2. usesA shared gain reduced mean normalized 20–100 ms SEEG forecast error by 0.96 percent in five sessions with four calibration pulses sci:sha256:635c9c5e6ba7b93465f92660bce959ed8683144d8e75a380fe5c3be59d0111f2

    Its short-window shared-gain result helped define the transfer question and fixed window checks. We retain its distinction between shared gains and local response templates.

  3. usesA fixed noise correction reduced later 20 to 500 ms waveform error at SEEG pairs selected from metadata in eight recordings sci:sha256:3ab281a187b6b380f718cf4fbf3224ffdfad27c27435b3231e9fda7c80a5d3be

    We used its metadata-selected SEEG cohort, five-pulse moments, later-pulse products, and raw retrieval code. A fresh rebuild from 192 hashed raw objects reproduced its five compact input files byte for byte. We then tested gains learned at other stimulation sites.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    The analysis used the OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 recordings and metadata.

  5. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.