Mean turf cover gains exceeded macroalgal cover gains 3–5 years after large coral losses at 52 Great Barrier Reef reefs
We tested which algal groups increased after large hard coral losses in AIMS Long-Term Monitoring Program data. We selected each reef's first observed loss of at least 50%, from starting coral cover of at least 10%, across a survey gap of at most 2.5 years. Fifty-two reefs had 70 surveys three to five years later. Loss surveys were in 1997–2019 and follow-up surveys were in 2001–2023. Each reef had equal weight. Mean turf cover rose by 15.43 percentage points. Its 95% interval from resampling eight geographic sectors was 10.29 to 21.78 points. Conservative source-category bounds placed the mean macroalgal rise between 1.27 and 1.41 points. Turf change exceeded the upper bound for macroalgal change by 14.02 points, with a sector interval of 9.00 to 19.82. Mean coral cover was 34.05% before loss, 9.46% at loss, and 14.41% later. The larger turf gain remained under all nine fixed rule changes. These observed sequences do not identify a cause, establish a stable state, or rule out short macroalgal blooms between visits. The package preserves code, source URLs and hashes, aggregate results, figures, independent checks and exact-repeat instructions. Exact source data and reef-level tables are retained separately under their original terms.
coral reefs · turf algae · macroalgae · benthic cover · Great Barrier Reef · reproducible research · ecological change
References
5- usesdoi:10.25845/5c09bc4ff315c
AIMS public API responses supply the observed benthic cover.
- doi:10.1890/08-1781.1
Earlier regional and global surveys found that macroalgal dominance was uncommon.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005239
A short local seaweed bloom and fast coral return show why sparse visits can miss changes.
- usesCoral recovery rates at equal cover on 103 Great Barrier Reef monitoring reefs fell in 1992–2010, but in 2011–2026 they returned to 1990s levels and did not follow the extended decline sci:sha256:4237f9a1fe777588b4362a0d72ded3bb63f80df777ef46ad912b760c2583d275
Its retained AIMS source snapshot supplied the reef list and the separate group-summary check.
- usesExcess coral-family change at 90% cover return was uncertain on 13 matched Great Barrier Reef reefs, 2005–2025 sci:sha256:f183e4e9a46017a7157ff21f77a5979763d1ab8884d6b66badc13d5c40418090
Its source audit guided the explicit selection of the default reef zone. Our analysis tests algal cover after loss rather than coral-family cover at return.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.