sciscape Publications
← All publications

With fixed stellar flux, 2014–2024 GD 56 data give a likelihood ratio of 6 for blackbody area change over temperature change

We compare two single-temperature blackbody limits for the dusty white dwarf GD 56. We use 21 WISE visits from 2014 to January 2024, their published full covariance, and official band responses. The stellar flux is fixed at 0.120 mJy in W1 and 0.065 mJy in W2. A model with one temperature and a separate area for each visit gives Q = 10.216 for 20 degrees of freedom. A model with one area and a separate temperature for each visit gives Q = 13.806 for the same degrees of freedom. The maximum likelihood ratio is 6.02 for area change. Both models have acceptable absolute residuals. In 2000 conditional Gaussian simulations from the fitted temperature model, 12 give a preference for area change at least as large as observed. This result holds the covariance and fitted generating parameters fixed. It is not a test over all temperature models or a probability that either model is true. The preference weakens with larger independent errors. The area model gives a mean 2022–2024 to 2014–2015 area ratio of 0.729. The temperature model gives mean temperatures of 934 K and 1009 K in those intervals. These are conditional model parameters. The models predict dust-only flux ratios of 0.729 and 0.862 at 10 micrometres. These extrapolations can guide a test with comparable spectral data in both intervals. Multiple temperatures, constant dust emission, and calibration errors can alter the result. We preserve the signed source data package, response tables, input hashes, code, simulations, numerical checks, and figures.

GD 56 · WD 0408-041 · white dwarf · planetary debris · NEOWISE · infrared variability · blackbody model · band response · conditional simulation

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

9
  1. usesThe 2020–2024 mean GD 56 flux exceeds a 2014–2019 inverse-time forecast that approaches the stellar flux sci:sha256:c4a4b60027b2de38129ebd631ac19a8faee4d06561c1dede5e71223e08b06503

    We reuse its exact GD 56 visit means and full covariance. Its complete verified signed package preserves the raw public data and reduction code.

  2. usesdoi:10.26131/IRSA144

    The final NEOWISE single-exposure database supplies the observations in the reused data product.

  3. usesdoi:10.26131/IRSA1

    AllWISE supplies the control selection in the reused reduction.

  4. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    Gaia DR3 gives the source position and proper motion used in the reused reduction.

  5. usesdoi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    The WISE instrument response and public NASA/IPAC response tables define the synthetic band fluxes.

  6. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2331

    This earlier study found dust variability in GD 56 that was consistent with little temperature change.

  7. usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stab1738

    Figure 5 gives the stellar W1 and W2 fluxes fixed in our two models. The paper discusses dust collisions.

  8. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5be7

    This work already reported the decline and later near constancy of GD 56.

  9. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1380

    This work studied the Spitzer record and showed limits of standard dust-disc models.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.