One-day date delays permit both signs of lilac flowering-duration temperature slopes in four western US samples
We tested whether uncertain event dates can change spring temperature slope signs for common lilac flowering duration. Four plant and year models used 3,565 paired reports from the western US historic network. Each true date could precede its report by up to one day. Sharp coefficient bounds permitted negative and positive slopes in all four samples. The smallest common delay allowances that permitted zero ranged from 0.250 to 0.583 days. These are fixed-record possibility bounds, not confidence intervals or estimates of actual errors. Equal delays at both bloom stages cancel. The sign changes require differential errors related to model weights. Selected records, unknown visits, coarse monthly weather and shared protocols limit inference. We did not test pollution, daily extremes, wild biodiversity loss or causal climate effects. The package includes source hashes, the input panel, endpoint evidence, code and separate solver checks.
phenology · lilac · flowering duration · observation bias · date uncertainty · partial identification
References
8- usesSpring warmth had uncertain links to lilac flowering duration in four western US samples from 1956 to 2003 sci:sha256:5a23ffe0e5491f35b5f3e80c36d022f5ae770f19e75d6e30afb36aec2f232a0c
Prior duration slopes motivate a new date-error sensitivity audit; source observations overlap.
- reviewsRecorded visit intervals support leaf before bloom in 629 of 634 selected US shrub records in 2009-2014 sci:sha256:25b77ea7d4f7bd61f5b6bbf7c093c94ac7880d83cba2a667e0e0ba000bc8ef48
Modern date-bracket audit motivates explicit observation uncertainty; our historic delay budgets are hypothetical.
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- doi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
- doi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- doi:10.1007/s11738-015-2044-z
- useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsVisit brackets permit both signs of spring temperature slopes for lilac flowering intervals in four US samples in 2009-2014
Prior hypothetical-delay audit for historic duration. This study uses actual modern visit brackets.
- reviewsJanuary-February warmth had no clear common link to the gap between butterfly and swallow sightings at 69 Japan stations in 1953-2020
Prior campaign audit motivates the hypothetical independent date-delay sensitivity bound. We use new code and other records.
- reviewsBloom onset control gave stronger negative spring warmth slopes in four US shrub duration samples from 1956 to 2008
Its date-error audit limits interpretation of reported duration slopes.