Local circular fits to 40 TESS eclipses do not resolve a mean depth change for KELT-20 b from 2019-2022 to 2024
We tested whether the mean TESS eclipse depth of KELT-20 b changed between 2019-2022 and 2024. We used seven public 120 s SPOC light curves and kept 40 eclipses with adequate coverage. We fixed a circular orbit and spherical geometry from prior work. Each event had a separate local quadratic baseline. We fitted sector time corrections to primary transits before fitting eclipses. The information-weighted depths were 141.3 ppm in 2019-2022 and 132.3 ppm in 2024. The 2024 minus 2019-2022 difference was -9.0 ppm. Its conditional 95% interval from whole-event resampling was [-56.2, +36.5] ppm. A check that grouped residuals by sector gave [-76.1, +58.1] ppm. All planned changes in baseline, window, flux product, timing, geometry, and event blocks gave intervals that included zero. One of six dependent off-eclipse controls gave +39.6 ppm with an interval of [+3.6, +74.9] ppm. This control shows that local structure can give apparent epoch differences. The data do not resolve the tested mean change. The result does not establish constant planet brightness or reject short changes seen with another instrument. We preserve the original data, provenance, event results, figures, code, local plan, and reproduction instructions. This study adds a defined epoch contrast and sector 81 to prior TESS eclipse work.
KELT-20 b · MASCARA-2 b · TESS · secondary eclipse · optical variability · null result · public data · reproducible analysis
References
9- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347533
This study supplies the fixed spherical TESS geometry and motivates the test of eclipse depth changes.
- doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae21be
This prior study uses two early 2024 TESS sectors and reports one combined eclipse depth. It sets the scope of the new epoch test.
- usesA local circular model gives a lower TESS secondary eclipse depth for TOI-1518 b in late 2024 than in 2022 sci:sha256:60e289bcfad7e6152dab3220b06620d4349f3f25d0810512d404a2e5af482cf8
Its local eclipse method, whole-event resampling, and off-eclipse controls informed this test on a different planet. We copied no code or data.
- usesdoi:10.17909/t9-nmc8-f686
Seven original TESS SPOC 120 s light curves are the observations for this analysis. Exact products and hashes are preserved.
- usesdoi:10.1086/683602
The batman software models the primary transits used to fit sector time corrections.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
NumPy supplies array calculations and random resampling.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
SciPy supplies time-shift optimization, numerical integration, and the t distribution.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74
Astropy reads the original FITS products.
- usesdoi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
Matplotlib makes the scientific figures.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Local circular fits to 53 TESS eclipses leave the 2022 to 2024 change unresolved for KELT-1 b
This local eclipse test for KELT-20 b provides related method context. We use new code and different observations.
- supportsUniform TESS 120-s photometry (Sectors 1–107) detects eclipses of 35 of 420 hot Jupiters at z ≥ 3 (2.2 false expected), 9 with no published TESS depth; blackbody emission explains the stacked depths
This SCI publication did not resolve a change of the mean TESS eclipse depth of KELT-20 b from 2019-2022 to 2024. Our test of all 7 sectors also finds no significant change (p = 0.10).