Archive scaled distances match semimajor axes in stellar radii within 10 percent for 82 of 83 selected eccentric planets
We tested the meaning of pl_ratdor in a NASA Exoplanet Archive Planetary Systems response received on 21 October 2026 UTC. The column label names a semimajor axis divided by stellar radius. Its description names a distance at mid-transit. We selected 83 eccentric transiting planets with complete core values and zero limit flags. Each record has equal planet and star paper references. Its approximate transit distance differs from the semimajor axis by at least 20 percent. For 82 planets, the listed scale matches the semimajor axis in stellar radii within 10 percent. The median absolute relative difference is 0.177 percent. None matches the approximate transit distance within 10 percent under the stated transit-angle convention. A 56-planet control rejects both opposite angle choices as approximate distance interpretations and retains all 56 semimajor-axis matches. We also tested 76 records with valid inclination and radius ratio. A geometric lower bound forbids a transit in 12 records if the scale means actual distance at mid-transit. All 12 allow a transit with the semimajor-axis meaning. This bound is independent of the periastron angle. The only primary semimajor-axis mismatch above 10 percent is HD 207496 b; its paper lists the same central values. We leave its cause unresolved. The package preserves the 491-record source response, full selection decisions, source checks, figures, and reproducible code. These are descriptive checks of selected central values, not new planet detections or population estimates.
NASA Exoplanet Archive · eccentric orbits · transit geometry · catalog validation · scaled semimajor axis · reproducible astronomy
References
8- usesdoi:10.26133/NEA12
The frozen TAP response comes from the Planetary Systems table. The package preserves the query, time, hash, and original reference strings.
- usesdoi:10.3847/PSJ/ade3c2
This is the archive reference for the public data service used in this audit.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.1001.2010
The transit approximation and angle convention follow equations 6 and 7. The orbital geometry is prior knowledge.
- usesdoi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41
We use the IAU nominal solar radius to convert the semimajor axis into stellar radii.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac134b
We check the Kepler-1704 b central values and scaled-axis label against Table 3 in arXiv version 2.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd408
We check the Kepler-1514 b central values and scaled-axis label against Tables 3 and 4.
- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245741
Tables 1 and 2 list the same HD 207496 b central values as the archive. The mismatch is present in the paper; this audit does not determine its cause.
- All 23 factor of two density differences use mixed sources in 600 small planets on 21 October 2026 sci:sha256:b7790fdbeb990341f24f7119aafd337bfff654dfe113c52b5eccafb3a078f139
This prior density audit shows why source agreement alone does not establish a common fit. The present audit tests field meaning in PS records and reuses no data or code from it.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- The reported angle quantiles for TOI-1472 b and TOI-1648 b do not agree with their eccentricity components under either 180 degree convention
This prior scaled-distance audit informs the discovery-stage transit geometry interpretation. No data or code are reused.
- The listed TOI-3862 b orbit sizes conflict within five error widths under the adopted stellar radius
A prior 83-planet field test supports the semimajor-axis meaning of the archive scaled distance. We extend the tested scope with interval boxes and a source check. We reuse no code or data.
- usesSpherical Kepler orbits give shorter transits than the listed durations for TOI-4515 b and TOI-4914 b
Its check of archive scaled distances supports the semimajor axis interpretation. The two focal source tables also identify that quantity.