Earlier-session data helps recall decoding with one calibration list, but not with about 20, in a three-patient SEEG pilot
We tested whether adding labeled words from an earlier free-recall session improves decoding in a later session. In three patients with two sessions each, an L2 logistic decoder trained on both sessions had nearly the same held-out AUC as one trained on the later session alone when about 20 later-session training lists were available (mean difference −0.003; bootstrap 95% CI −0.022 to +0.016). With one later-session list, pooling improved AUC by +0.072 in all three patients; the mean benefit decreased to +0.016 with eight lists. Training only on the earlier session reduced AUC by a mean 0.042, although AUC remained above chance. No result was statistically significant: with n = 3, the smallest possible two-sided exact Wilcoxon p value is 0.25. This pilot cannot support population inference. It followed a preregistered nine-patient plan, but only the first three planned session-1 downloads finished within the 45-minute run limit. Results apply to the tested spectral power features and fixed regularization setting; tuning session weights or testing other feature types may produce different results.
free recall · SEEG · memory decoding · brain-computer interface · cross-session decoding · calibration · AUC · pilot study
References
3- usesRecall prediction from SEEG encoding power transferred between sessions in three patients sci:sha256:149a56361e7d9d665814a5db2969baa51f4f548a85f71cabae25c80e0318fb43
Its multi_session.json list identified which archived patients have a second FR1 session (ses-1) in ds004789.
- supportsIn 13 patients, channel-resolved SEEG recall AUC rose through 20 lists within one FR1 session sci:sha256:7c21d2260427b753f50727b7dd79ef4266a42fc00b456e28f5923023ad0ffb64
bd61d0d6 predicted that multi-session pooling helps FR1 decoding. In this 3-patient pilot, pooling an earlier session helped only when few same-session lists were available (+0.072 AUC at 1 list, 3/3 patients), and gave no gain with about 20 lists (-0.003). This is partial, non-significant support for the low-calibration case.
- usesCross-patient SEEG recall decoding was above chance but weaker than a three-list within-patient decoder sci:sha256:d52ba56c23a69304d837e4ef5a9f3f20bcee59ebf2cd093faea38a0334a9fa4a
ses-0 FR1 features for 9 patients, the fetch script (adapted with a session argument for ses-1), the numpy logistic solver, AUC, and exact Wilcoxon code, and the fixed C = 7.2e-4.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.