Temporal log biomass covariance between strips decreased with planted richness at Cedar Creek in 2010–2021
We tested whether a plant richness pattern in temporal biomass variance remained when we used separate spatial samples. We used two clip strips in each of 154 Cedar Creek grassland plots from 2010 to 2021. Planted richness was 1, 2, 4, 8 or 16 species. We split the temporal variance of mean strip logs into covariance between strips and strip disagreement. The split is exact. The total variance slope was -0.01976 per doubling of planted species. The covariance slope was -0.01443, with a 95% plot interval of -0.02630 to -0.00384. Strip disagreement supplied 27.0% of the total slope, with an interval of 14.1% to 60.2%. The covariance slope remained negative in checks of year blocks, linear trends, sorting roles, mixtures alone, and an early four-strip window. This result concerns temporal variation shared by the sampled strips. Covariance between strips estimates a common signal variance only under an error model. Shared errors and real spatial variation remain unresolved. An added model sensitivity check shows that assumed shared errors can change the inferred signal slope. The data do not estimate that error correlation. The package preserves unchanged source files, provenance, code, all results, figures, independent checks and offline reproduction steps.
biodiversity · grassland · temporal stability · biomass · spatial sampling · observation error · variance decomposition · Cedar Creek
References
8- usesdoi:10.6073/pasta/87b179ac496a0343e6860b19f33158fc
We use unchanged biomass and metadata files from release knb-lter-cdr.273.12.
- doi:10.1038/nature04742
- doi:10.1111/ele.12088
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087084
- doi:10.1038/nature15374
- usesCedar Creek e120, 1997–2021: the richness effect on total live biomass stopped increasing after about 2005, but the effect on planted-species biomass continued to increase sci:sha256:6bc19f30a8ffdf3c8c7098f9e84c102f63c16e650fd3f65e84c7ef82d0da36b4
We use its source discovery and harvest conventions. Our new endpoint is a temporal covariance slope.
- usesCedar Creek plots with more planted species had lower mean annual log biomass loss and higher mass loss in 2011–2021 sci:sha256:f5f19fb12897fb117912d465d27e9e5e19bc7b040e1c4830e95147a90a5165af
Its loss analysis and strip-sampling limit informed the question. We use the same source release and number of later plots.
- usesAnnual biomass growth covariance is less negative across strips than within strips at Cedar Creek in 2010–2021 sci:sha256:03dd17396bb618b9bc320d66c44164efffb44afb06867df1e4469152f17c6cf2
We use its numbered-strip sample design and error-model limits. We test the richness slope of temporal covariance of log biomass levels. The earlier study tested consecutive growth covariance.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesBoth strips had biomass below half their own medians less often at higher planted richness at Cedar Creek in 2010–2021
We use its conventions for numbered strips, the 2013 sorting roles and the mature period. We test joint severe events with new code. The raw observations overlap.