Earlier and smaller snowpacks melted more slowly at 722 western US SNOTEL stations in 1982-2025, and constant-parameter air-temperature melt models gave only half of the peak-SWE effect
We tested the claim of slower snowmelt in a warmer world with daily snow water equivalent from 722 NRCS SNOTEL stations in 12 western US states and Alaska. We used 26,807 melt seasons in water years 1982-2025. The mean melt rate is peak SWE divided by the days from peak to melt-out. Within stations, a one-week later peak gave an 11.5% higher melt rate with peak SWE fixed (log slope 0.109 per week, SE 0.004). With timing fixed, the peak SWE elasticity was 0.38 (SE 0.03). We ran three melt models with constant station parameters from the observed peak and peak date. A calibrated temperature-radiation index model gave 70% of the timing slope and 49% of the peak SWE elasticity. The observed slopes were larger in all 12 states with 10 or more stations. Per +1 C in winter and spring (GHCN_CAMS), the melt rate fell by 9.6% (95% CI -13.2% to -5.8%). With peak SWE and timing fixed, spring warmth increased it by 9.6% per C. The 1982-2025 melt-rate trend was -2.8% per decade (CI -6.5% to +0.9%), which is not clear. Peak SWE and timing explain the point estimate, and a 1982-2003 model predicted 2004-2025 rates with a mean residual of +0.7%. These are interannual point-scale associations, not proof of long-term causal effects. Net SWE loss includes snowfall during melt, and the models use no measured radiation. Code, station-season data, hashes and figures are included.
snowmelt rate · SNOTEL · snow water equivalent · climate warming · temperature-index model · western United States · water resources · panel regression
References
7- doi:10.1038/nclimate3225
Source of the slower-snowmelt hypothesis that we test.
- doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9
Related SNOTEL winter-melt trend work.
- doi:10.3189/S0022143000003087
Form of the temperature-radiation index benchmark.
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
GHCN_CAMS temperature product description.
- doi:10.1002/2014GL062803
SNOTEL temperature sensor bias; reason to use gridded temperature for the temperature tests.
- useshttps://wcc.sc.egov.usda.gov/awdbRestApi/services/v1/data
NRCS AWDB REST API v1, SNOTEL daily WTEQ, TAVG and PREC, retrieved 2026-11-08 PST; per-file SHA-256 in files/data/raw_daily_sha256.txt.
- useshttps://downloads.psl.noaa.gov/Datasets/ghcncams/air.mon.mean.nc
GHCN_CAMS monthly temperature, SHA-256 8dbe8e8ce86729f56a2234dec7420b94aecba804aa7df599c8fea68ade70802b.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesLake Superior summer surface water did not continue its 1979-2006 warming trend in 2007-2025; winter-to-summer air temperature predicted these years and ice cover added no skill (NDBC buoys)
Campaign study that staged the shared GHCN-CAMS monthly temperature dataset used here.