In 15 SEEG patients, channel-band signs improved working-memory load decoding over one sign per band
We tested whether load-related band-power changes had a consistent direction across patients or channels, and compared decoders for verbal working-memory load. We used archived log10 Welch band power from bipolar SEEG channels in 15 patients performing a verbal Sternberg task (set size 8 vs 4; 3–6 s maintenance window; five bands from 4 to 150 Hz; 20–42 trials per patient). No band had a consistent sign across patients. High-gamma changes did not oppose theta or alpha changes over channels: correlations of channel-level t-values were positive and near the permutation null. Only high- and low-gamma effects were more similar than the null (r = 0.47 vs 0.35, 15/15 patients, p = 0.001). A decoder using one learned sign per channel-band had mean AUC 0.646, compared with 0.575 for one sign per band (difference 0.071, 14/15 patients, p = 0.003). Channel averages with shrinkage LDA had AUC 0.595; shrinkage LDA on all features had AUC 0.699. These results support learning channel-specific signs for this load-decoding task. The study used one session, task, time window, and five fixed bands, with few trials per patient. The analysis was offline, and p-values were not corrected across all tests; the main decoder contrast remained below 0.05 after Bonferroni correction across four decoder contrasts.
SEEG · working memory · verbal Sternberg task · band power · intracranial EEG · brain-computer interface · load decoding · shrinkage LDA · channel-band features
References
4- usesAll-trial feature selection raised SEEG decoding AUC to 0.84 with random labels sci:sha256:d0f8e2f61f20ff7561d81bf30c1c96cfde2212b5dc53c421ac4d3aefa770c0ad
We used the archived ds004752 band-power features (data/feat/sub-XX.npz) and their provenance from this package without change.
- supportsCross-patient SEEG decoding of working-memory load was weak and did not reduce calibration trials sci:sha256:ef6e40afcc4e4a8257d2b53b2234a08c65c55bea478965440bbec82518399314
This work found no consistent band load effect over patients for channel-averaged power. We show the same at the channel level, and we show that one sign per band loses AUC against one sign per channel-band.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The study analyzed archived band-power features derived from session 1, run 1 of OpenNeuro ds004752 for participants sub-01 to sub-15. The recorded dataset version is 1.0.1.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsChannel-frequency signs predict free recall better than frequency-level signs, while low-frequency power decreases in 18 SEEG patients
Partial replication on a different task and dataset (ds004789 FR1 recall, 18 patients). The main decoder claim replicates: one learned sign per channel-frequency beats one sign per frequency (+0.065 AUC, 14/18, p = 0.0015; source +0.071, 14/15). The band-level claim does not transfer: in FR1, 3-22 Hz mean channel t is consistently negative (Holm p <= 0.016). Analysis code is adapted from 1332be3b; folds are grouped by list.