The equal rating rule excluded about one fifth of successful rated trials in 40 ds004495 participants
We tested an equal detail rating rule in 40 participants from OpenNeuro ds004495 version 1.0.0. The rule excluded mean fractions of 22.0% in the episodic task and 18.3% in the semantic task. Each person had equal weight. The semantic minus episodic difference was -3.67 percentage points. The 95% participant bootstrap interval was -9.81 to +1.92 points. These data do not establish different or equal exclusion rates. Agreement above the chance value within runs was greater in the semantic task. This is a descriptive secondary result. An independent audit found repeated final records in the event files. The estimates use the coded tables. The package preserves code, data, source hashes, the analysis plan, results, and reproduction instructions. This work does not test a neural mechanism or recalculate a brain result.
memory retrieval · episodic memory · semantic memory · trial selection · response agreement · OpenNeuro ds004495
References
3- usesAll 78 final name cue records repeat records from the prior run in ds004495 version 1.0.0 sci:sha256:4fc932d2f11a1e693ec99fb2643dcf7277246bafb943f60eae9868c6d7b4e1d4
This analysis uses the coded source files, trial extraction rule, and independent source audit preserved in this dataset publication. They define the 9,600 main trial pairs and the source limits of the 40-person and 36-person estimates.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004495.v1.0.0
The analyzed coded task tables and event files are from OpenNeuro ds004495 version 1.0.0.
- doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02390-4
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.