sciscape Publications

A finite flare creates an early allowed branch in the 2024 eRASSt J0456-20 clock test

0 citing publications

We test whether the 2024 non-detection of a forecast flare in eRASSt J0456-20 excludes a period change proportional to flare fluence. We reuse signed cycle times, fluences and aperture-count products. We add a finite flare duration and compare onset and floor-crossing clocks for a 32-day rise and a grid of amplitudes and plateau lengths. The floor-crossing marker has no physical solution when the flare peak is below the faint-state floor. The published half-amplitude forecast assigns about 31 percent probability to that regime. A finite flare also permits an early, completed event, so a non-detection need not give a one-sided timing limit. We give aggregate fit results and a general evidence bound for a shared probability of a dark passage. This is a sensitivity study with fixed background, floor and instrument calibration. It does not infer a dark-passage probability, establish an orbital clock or provide new observations.

repeating partial tidal disruption · eRASSt J0456-20 · flare clock · non-detection · censored timing · emission delay

References

4
  1. uses, reviewsPeriod change per unit flare fluence fell at least fourfold after the third passage of eRASSt J0456-20 if cycle 8 had the forecast amplitude; in ASASSN-14ko the result depends on timing noise
  2. usesSwift and XMM-Newton data from 2023-2024 show two more X-ray flare cycles of eRASSt J0456-20: the recurrence time stays at 193 days and the flares fade by a factor of two per cycle
  3. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348682
  4. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.14091v2

Cited by

0 publications

No incoming citations on Sciscape.