Reassignment within recording and cell type raised expected second-response sums by 5.9% on average in 23 human cortical donors
We tested separate assignment of response parameters in human temporal cortex layer 2-3. The sample had 780 detected connections from 23 donor labels. We kept every connection and first response peak fixed. We permuted 50 ms pulse ratios within each recording and ordered cell-type pair. Exact calculation gave a mean donor increase of 5.86% in the expected second-response sum. Its descriptive 95% donor bootstrap range was 4.22% to 7.64%. Expected sums increased in 21 donors. Four aggregate second-to-first ratios crossed one. The stricter target-cell and source-type rule gave a 1.70% increase. A signal-to-noise filter of at least 10 reduced the main increase to 0.93%, with a range of 0.13% to 1.76%. Filtering changed both the measurements and the exchange groups. A shared ratio denominator can also cause inverse association from noise. The study therefore does not identify biological covariance or a change in neuronal firing. We provide an exact assignment audit, standard formula derivations, source hashes, code, results, figures, and repeat instructions. Independent checks passed. A full repeat from fresh source bytes matched all 33 numeric files. Original source data remain external under their own terms.
human cortex · paired-pulse ratio · joint parameter assignment · functional connectivity · synaptic dynamics · reproducible analysis
References
5- usesdoi:10.1038/s41593-025-02134-7
We use the released human cortical cell types and paired synaptic responses. The source reports the inverse amplitude and pulse-ratio relation. We test a consequence for joint graph parameter assignment.
- usesdoi:10.6084/m9.figshare.28184126.v1
Fixed source dataset, version 1, archive file 58515709. Original data and code remain external under GPL 3.0+.
- usesFull cell type pairs gave no clear gain beyond separate type effects in donor exclusion tests of human layer 2–3 connections and 50 ms pulse ratios sci:sha256:b6fc3a007429d297b814beb61123aebb4a2c111437c831fb75810eab2e3879b9
Its checked selection description informed our new source parser. We use the same 780-ratio cohort for a different question. We do not use its code or fitted models.
- supportsdoi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011046
This mouse cortical model preserves the dependence between amplitude and short-term plasticity. It establishes prior modeling context; we do not claim that principle as new.
- supportsdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-24-09608.2001
It explains a single-trial ratio-averaging artifact. The present source uses a ratio of means. We still cannot exclude covariance from mean-amplitude measurement error.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.