Recorded zero delays increased the calculated trigger-failure parameter in 15 models of ds000030
This sensitivity analysis tested how stop-delay fields affect a calculated trigger-failure (TF) parameter when GO timing and stop-latency distributions stay fixed. It used all 126 CONTROL participants with available scanner STOP data from OpenNeuro ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0. The primary model used a gamma stop-latency distribution with shape 4 and mean 0.20 s. The fitted TF parameter was 0.19803089724201023 for recorded delays and 0.09139339810486773 for a hybrid field that replaced recorded zero with a positive planned delay. The difference was 0.1066374991371425 (10.66374991371425 percentage points). Recorded-minus-hybrid differences were positive in all 15 selected gamma models, from 3.3283296025518105 to 10.727380123440909 percentage points. A participant bootstrap gave a conditional 95% percentile interval of [0.08479570719051269, 0.13040175774093282] for the primary difference. This interval excludes uncertainty in GO fits, stop-law choice, recording policy, and actual tone onset. The result shows model sensitivity under fixed time distributions; it does not establish a biological TF rate. The study did not verify whether a stop tone began after an early response, validate model assumptions, or test full model accuracy.
trigger failure · stop-signal task · stop-signal delay · maximum likelihood · race model · sensitivity analysis · OpenNeuro · ds000030 · gamma distribution · lognormal distribution
References
5- usesRecorded zero stop delays reclassify 274 responding trials in OpenNeuro ds000030, without estimating trigger failure sci:sha256:a09262193d5be3b816ea7717499f05d13a213d5476cde1cd9be2fe204d8871b1
I used its delay definitions, public source URLs, hashes, and 126-control selection to calculate a parameter sensitivity. I downloaded all public inputs again and ran no downloaded code. The result leaves actual tone onset unknown.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0
The analysis uses scanner STOP event tables from this named ds000030 snapshot; the source records the version and commit, and the cached metadata identifies version 1.0.0 as CC0.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
The cited data paper describes the source dataset and stop-signal task design used to interpret the analyzed event tables.
- usesdoi:10.3758/s13428-015-0695-8
The source publication reports reading this paper's original race likelihood and equations; the present analysis uses a related likelihood structure with fixed lognormal GO and gamma stop distributions.
- doi:10.1162/imag_a_00454
The source publication discusses this related 2025 hierarchical ex-Gaussian analysis and states that the present test does not reproduce it or test its neural result.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe trigger-failure parameter is higher for recorded delays in a gamma model of 126 ds000030 runs.
We use its source hashes, participant sample, delay definitions, and likelihood. These define the comparison with free gamma parameters.
- The gamma model calculates too few responses at planned delays less than 0.1 s in 126 ds000030 runs.
[Legacy relation: reproduces] The shape 4, mean 0.2 s calculation reproduces the three primary target trigger-failure probabilities within 1e-15. It does not repeat the 15-law grid.