Against matched living controls, English Wikipedia views after 17,866 deaths in 2019–2023 were 8% higher in year 2 and not higher in year 4; year-4 change was +40% below age 60 and −11% at 85+
Question: does the death of a notable person change long-term attention to the English Wikipedia article, relative to the attention that the article would get if the person were alive? Approach: we extracted monthly user pageviews per page id for all English Wikipedia pages in 43 quarterly months (2016-01 to 2026-07) from the Wikimedia pageview_complete dumps. We downloaded only the en.wikipedia byte range of each file. We matched each of 17,866 deaths of 2019–2023 (Wikidata humans with at least 5 sitelinks) to 10 of 395,169 living people with the same gender, occupation group and birth year (±3) and the nearest view levels in the two years that end 12 months before death. The effect is the treated change in mean log(1+monthly views) from year −2 minus the matched-control change in the same calendar months. Results: year 1 +0.353 (95% CI 0.345 to 0.361), year 2 +0.078 (0.070 to 0.085), year 3 +0.025, year 4 −0.004 (−0.013 to 0.004). There is no pre-death trend (year −1 +0.005). Three placebo runs with pseudo deaths of living people gave −0.016 to 0.000 in all years. Age at death sets the long-term sign: year-4 effects are +0.336 (<60), +0.063 (60–74), −0.007 (75–84) and −0.117 (85+), and year-6 effects are +0.273 and −0.187 for the youngest and oldest groups. Controls who died in 2024–2026 give the same pattern. The age gradient reproduces an earlier SCI study on a 6% sample. Less-viewed articles and unnatural deaths have larger year-2 effects, and a larger death spike goes with a larger year-2 effect. Limits: bootstrap intervals do not include control reuse; few placebo units are 85+; living controls are people who survived to October 2026; years 5–7 contain only early cohorts.
collective attention · collective memory · Wikipedia pageviews · death · matched controls · difference-in-differences · placebo test · Wikidata · age at death · computational social science
References
5- Against matched controls, year-2 English Wikipedia views rose about 60% after deaths before age 60 and fell about 11% after deaths at 85+ (1,276 deaths, 2016–2024) sci:sha256:c779efba615ed21a0939b24e75a78eb82be34caf37af8cd957d8cb93c4247ef6
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Same question and a similar matched design on a 6% sample; we reproduce its age-at-death gradient with all 2019–2023 deaths, page-id counts from bulk dumps and placebo calibration, and we extend the follow-up to 7 years.
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2106152118
Postmortem memory of public figures in news and Twitter; self-baseline decay after death.
- doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0474-5
Universal decay of collective memory and attention, including Wikipedia biographies.
- doi:10.1038/s41598-022-25840-9
Two-phase decay model of Wikipedia attention after events, including deaths.
- The 2020 bot label change causes half of the apparent 2016–2025 decrease in English Wikipedia attention time after 4,547 notable deaths, and the time did not decrease after mid-2020 sci:sha256:a1316fbacbbc1bb6fa13010eea14a9505b567f54aa94154e12a5b0b922f9d1e1
Shows the 2020 automated-traffic label change in Wikipedia user views; our matched design compares treated and control units in the same calendar months.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.