sciscape Publications
← All publications

Against matched living controls, English Wikipedia views after 17,866 deaths in 2019–2023 were 8% higher in year 2 and not higher in year 4; year-4 change was +40% below age 60 and −11% at 85+

Question: does the death of a notable person change long-term attention to the English Wikipedia article, relative to the attention that the article would get if the person were alive? Approach: we extracted monthly user pageviews per page id for all English Wikipedia pages in 43 quarterly months (2016-01 to 2026-07) from the Wikimedia pageview_complete dumps. We downloaded only the en.wikipedia byte range of each file. We matched each of 17,866 deaths of 2019–2023 (Wikidata humans with at least 5 sitelinks) to 10 of 395,169 living people with the same gender, occupation group and birth year (±3) and the nearest view levels in the two years that end 12 months before death. The effect is the treated change in mean log(1+monthly views) from year −2 minus the matched-control change in the same calendar months. Results: year 1 +0.353 (95% CI 0.345 to 0.361), year 2 +0.078 (0.070 to 0.085), year 3 +0.025, year 4 −0.004 (−0.013 to 0.004). There is no pre-death trend (year −1 +0.005). Three placebo runs with pseudo deaths of living people gave −0.016 to 0.000 in all years. Age at death sets the long-term sign: year-4 effects are +0.336 (<60), +0.063 (60–74), −0.007 (75–84) and −0.117 (85+), and year-6 effects are +0.273 and −0.187 for the youngest and oldest groups. Controls who died in 2024–2026 give the same pattern. The age gradient reproduces an earlier SCI study on a 6% sample. Less-viewed articles and unnatural deaths have larger year-2 effects, and a larger death spike goes with a larger year-2 effect. Limits: bootstrap intervals do not include control reuse; few placebo units are 85+; living controls are people who survived to October 2026; years 5–7 contain only early cohorts.

collective attention · collective memory · Wikipedia pageviews · death · matched controls · difference-in-differences · placebo test · Wikidata · age at death · computational social science

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. Against matched controls, year-2 English Wikipedia views rose about 60% after deaths before age 60 and fell about 11% after deaths at 85+ (1,276 deaths, 2016–2024) sci:sha256:c779efba615ed21a0939b24e75a78eb82be34caf37af8cd957d8cb93c4247ef6

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] Same question and a similar matched design on a 6% sample; we reproduce its age-at-death gradient with all 2019–2023 deaths, page-id counts from bulk dumps and placebo calibration, and we extend the follow-up to 7 years.

  2. doi:10.1073/pnas.2106152118

    Postmortem memory of public figures in news and Twitter; self-baseline decay after death.

  3. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0474-5

    Universal decay of collective memory and attention, including Wikipedia biographies.

  4. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-25840-9

    Two-phase decay model of Wikipedia attention after events, including deaths.

  5. The 2020 bot label change causes half of the apparent 2016–2025 decrease in English Wikipedia attention time after 4,547 notable deaths, and the time did not decrease after mid-2020 sci:sha256:a1316fbacbbc1bb6fa13010eea14a9505b567f54aa94154e12a5b0b922f9d1e1

    Shows the 2020 automated-traffic label change in Wikipedia user views; our matched design compares treated and control units in the same calendar months.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.