In NestWatch records of 19 North American birds (1960–2025), the spatial temperature slope of first-egg date was 1.5–1.8 times the year-to-year slope; a data-source change confounds long-term tests
Question: does the year-to-year temperature sensitivity of bird laying dates agree with the spatial (space-for-time) sensitivity and with the long-term change? Data: 98,797 first nesting attempts of 19 passerine species in the NestWatch Open Dataset v6 (USA and Canada, 1960–2025). The first-egg date comes from nest checks during laying. Temperature: GHCN-CAMS 0.5° monthly, and nClimGrid 4 km as a check. Method: b_t is the within-cell year-to-year slope of first-egg date on species-window temperature. b_s is the slope of cell mean dates, adjusted to the 1991–2020 normal, on the cell normal. We used a 2° block bootstrap and pooled species with random effects. Results: the median b_t was −1.30 and the median b_s −2.27 days/°C. The pooled b_s − b_t was −0.88 days/°C (95% CI −1.30 to −0.45). It was negative in all ten variants (−0.53 to −1.32), and the interval excluded zero in nine. No species had a significantly positive difference. With 4-km temperature, b_t did not become steeper and the difference became larger (−1.32). With latitude in the spatial model, the 0.5° difference became small and uncertain (−0.21, CI −0.76 to 0.34). Thus space-for-time models overpredict plastic advance per °C by about 1.5–1.8 times, and part of this goes with latitude. Long-term: from 1960–1994 to 2005–2025, dates in the same cells advanced more than early b_t and local warming predict (Eastern Bluebird −7.1 days excess, Tree Swallow −1.6 days). But the comparison crosses a change from digitized nest-record cards to NestWatch entries, with only 7 shared cell-years. The excess depends on cell size, and two species have abrupt steps at the change. Within each source, observed changes agreed with the prediction within about 2 days. Limitations: citizen-science sampling, monthly temperature, first-brood selection by mixture models, and no redistribution of the non-commercial NestWatch records. Code and all aggregate results are included.
breeding phenology · laying date · space-for-time substitution · phenotypic plasticity · climate change · NestWatch · nest record cards · citizen science · birds · temperature sensitivity · data-source bias
References
10- usesdoi:10.17632/wjf794z7gc.6
NestWatch Open Dataset v6: source of all nest attempt and nest check records (not redistributed).
- usesdoi:10.1002/ecy.4230
Metadata paper that defines NestWatch fields.
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
GHCN-CAMS monthly gridded land temperature.
- usesdoi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0248.1
nClimGrid 4-km monthly temperature for the resolution check.
- doi:10.1111/gcb.13302
Prior comparison of spatial and temporal laying-date slopes in UK passerines.
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0913792107
Spatial versus temporal phenology slopes as evidence of local adaptation (frogs).
- doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0942
Tree Swallow laying advance from North American nest record cards, 1959-1991.
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1705897114
Long-term shifts of bird breeding phenology from historical and modern records.
- A heat-sum model fitted to year-to-year variation predicts 84% of the spatial flowering gradient of clonal Somei-yoshino cherry at 81 Japanese stations in 1953–2025; adding chilling gives 94–98% sci:sha256:f14cf93db545148c4932132945c22334891b263a6b2f0de9e0e09cae65eb4ded
Related SCI test of whether year-to-year phenology sensitivity predicts a spatial gradient (Japanese cherry); there the temporal model predicted most of the gradient.
- At 867 English river sites, fish communities changed by about one third of the amount that the between-site relation to invertebrate ASPT predicts (1990–2004 to 2012–2025) sci:sha256:0049ed3a20117b588f8b69d1066863b4683edc5ea8d25ee1f6ad7ad483ed87fd
Related SCI comparison of temporal change with a between-site (spatial) relation, for river fish.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- NestWatch first-egg dates of 22 North American bird species (1997–2025) were 3 days later in the first year of a nest site, and this caused the apparent extra advance within sites
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Its main result (spatial slope of first-egg date steeper than the year-to-year slope in NestWatch; difference small with latitude) is reproduced with an independent design: daily CPC temperature, cross-fitted windows, site fixed effects, two-way clustering, 22 species, 1997-2025.