sciscape Publications
← All publications

With 2 m/s extra Gaussian noise, Gliese 12 velocities give 95% bounds below 1.73 m/s for one circular signal at 34, 39, or 58 days

We test sensitivity to one added circular signal in the public HARPS-N, ESPRESSO, and CARMENES velocities of Gliese 12. The main sample has 192 measurements. We fit separate instrument offsets and H-alpha slopes, with a signed amplitude at the fixed transit clock of planet b. We assume independent Gaussian errors with quoted variance plus (2 m/s)^2. At fixed periods of 34, 39, and 58 days, conservative 95% upper amplitude bounds are 1.724, 1.418, and 1.603 m/s. A separate power calculation gives sufficient amplitudes of 1.706, 1.697, and 1.743 m/s for at least 95% detection power at every phase. This calculation uses a conservative 1% false alarm threshold across 1099 frequencies from 5 to 100 days. The largest main-model residual peak is at 31.398 days, with a chi-square decrease of 29.887. Its analytic upper bound on the global null p value is 0.000356 under that fixed model. The score falls below the conservative threshold when a specified 30-day covariance is added with the same total diagonal variance. Activity terms also change the peak and sensitivity. We report all nine planned models and a denser grid check. Full GLS fits, injections, Gaussian simulations, and a fresh-directory repeat check the calculation. The bounds apply to one circular signal at each fixed period under the stated model. They do not exclude the full published multi-signal models or establish a new planet. The package preserves the source data, provenance, row selections, information matrices, results, figures, code, and reproduction instructions.

Gliese 12 · radial velocities · detection sensitivity · amplitude bounds · orbital phase · stellar activity · fixed Gaussian covariance · reproducible data

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesA fixed Gliese 12 b signal lowers error in two of three instrument tests with 2 m/s extra noise sci:sha256:83087be81627de2d8c7464f82b09a470219cd088a63d4dae1245ae82d0161603

    We use its verified source table and selection conventions. Fresh CDS downloads match its source files. We add second-signal sensitivity and amplitude bounds.

  2. usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/staf1703

    We use the public velocity and H-alpha table, source flags, photometry-only transit clock, and rotation period. Its reported second signal near 34 days motivates a reference period.

  3. usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.20561

    We use the reported 39- and 58-day signals as reference periods and Table 1 for the illustrative fixed stellar mass. We inspected arXiv version 1. We do not use MAROON-X data or test its full model.

  4. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae0f98

    This is the journal version of the Brady study. The text inspected here was its arXiv version 1.

  5. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811296

    This paper describes the generalized least-squares periodogram model. We use standard linear Gaussian fits and power calculations.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.