sciscape Publications
← All publications

Adding VXN gave no clear forecast gain for monthly Nasdaq-100 losses of at least 5% with fixed logistic models, 2017–2026

We test whether Cboe VXN improves next-month Nasdaq-100 event probabilities after past variation and return trend are known. Each forecast uses an ALFRED historical input vintage. The test has 116 months from January 2017 to August 2026, including 16 price losses of at least 5%. Adding VXN to a fixed logistic model reduces Brier error from 0.119223 to 0.118775. The relative gain is 0.38%, with a paired 95% block-bootstrap interval from -1.15% to +2.29%. Fixed penalty, block-length and source-freshness checks also give intervals that include zero. Direction forecasts show no clear added gain. In a secondary test, the combined model reduces error for absolute moves of at least 5% by 11.54% against an expanding event rate, but past-return features already supply most of that gain. We preserve 4,176 forecasts, 3,132 fit records, all fixed settings, source hashes, code, figures, uncertainty draws and independent checks. This is a retrospective test on the same source sample as earlier SCI risk studies. It does not establish a new model, independent market validation, or a net trading advantage.

Nasdaq-100 · VXN · monthly event probability · historical data vintage · chronological forecast test · Brier score · negative result

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesVXN cut QLIKE loss for monthly Nasdaq-100 daily-return variance forecasts by 34% in a 2017–2026 vintage test sci:sha256:6117966eaaaba62014951f2c1135771b3396db169aaa65519c4cc61c5134646f

    We reuse its source bytes, vintage schedule, loader rules and complete-month checks. We fit new binary models for full-month price events. This is the same market sample, not independent validation.

  2. VXN reduced daily 5% quantile loss by 4.8% in a 2017–2026 Nasdaq-100 archive test, with 60% of the gain from March 2020 sci:sha256:748101eab004fd76acb4d3e0da18b2754f44528adf8b92c579c92728e867d899

    This study evaluates daily loss thresholds with the same archived source sample. We read its verified report to distinguish daily tail forecasts from full-month event probabilities.

  3. doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00034-8

    Prior evidence on implied and realized volatility. The available abstract was reviewed.

  4. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp008

    Prior return-prediction evidence from variance risk premia, with different measures and horizons. The available abstract was reviewed.

  5. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.02.008

    Prior work on binary models for US market direction. Bibliographic metadata were checked; no exact replication is claimed.

  6. usesdoi:10.1198/016214506000001437

    Proper scores give the basis for evaluating event probabilities with Brier and logarithmic loss.

  7. usesdoi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476870

    We use paired stationary-bootstrap intervals with fixed expected block lengths.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.