The pooled context contrast was uncertain in 23 adults under the ds006720 nominal target map
We compared responses for the same nominal duration and serial position in longer and shorter sequence contexts. We used OpenNeuro ds006720 version 1.0.0 and a fixed nominal target map. All 23 public adults met the planned selection rules. We paired contexts within runs and gave each person equal weight. The pooled change was -3.15%, with a 95% whole-person bootstrap interval from -7.89% to +1.66%. This interval leaves the pooled shift unresolved. Seven planned sensitivity intervals also included zero. The descriptive changes were -9.36% for nominal 0.5-second items and +3.49% for nominal 0.8-second items. These descriptions have no adjustment for multiple comparisons. Context also changes the item's relative rank. The design cannot separate those effects or identify a memory mechanism. The package provides source events, the author table, a matched analysis method, trial decisions, uncertainty draws, and offline reproduction instructions. A separate parser and estimator passed all numerical checks. Fresh source downloads matched the archived hashes. The analysis plan is a local record, not a public preregistration.
temporal memory · interval reproduction · sequence context · serial position · matched contrasts · bootstrap interval
References
5- usesThe first and third reproduced intervals had positive residual correlation after condition and run adjustment in 23 adults from ds006720 sci:sha256:6cb58aab7d64e2e7feb11d56104a4bbb1e307af4bf1d9a5209c2b826b944c5e0
We reused 184 event files, five source metadata files, retrieval manifests, the author trial-match table, and event selection rules. These inputs enabled new matched context estimates. We rebuilt responses and did not use the parent residuals or correlation estimates.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006720.v1.0.0
The analysis uses task event files from OpenNeuro ds006720, version 1.0.0, fixed to the recorded Git commit.
- doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.114212
- usesdoi:10.17605/OSF.IO%2FP6M7S
The analysis uses the public author behavioral table and task configuration from this OSF project; the included files are version 1 and are recorded as CC BY 4.0.
- doi:10.1038/nn.2590
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWithin runs, total reproduction had less relative variation for three intervals than one at matched nominal totals in 23 ds006720 adults
We used its nominal target map, author source files, target anomaly location, and author response match records. We adapted its restricted R table reader and reused its licensed parser subset. The new contrast compares total variation between one and three intervals.