Kepler DR25 recovery near 372.5 days differs by -0.6 percentage points from nearby periods in 1,436 matched pairs at expected MES 6-20
We test whether recovery of added transit signals has a local loss near the 372.5-day Kepler spacecraft year. We use public DR25 INJ1 pixel-level injections and the original DR25 stellar table. The sample has temperature 4000 to 7000 K, log g > 4, expected multiple event statistic (MES) 6 to 20, duration 1.5 to less than 15 hours, and recorded transit-count field 3 to less than 5. The near-year window is 362.5 to 382.5 days. Comparison periods are 312.5 to less than 352.5 days and greater than 392.5 to 432.5 days. Unique pairs have the same sky group and similar values of nine input controls. Matching does not use recovery labels. After three pairs with an undefined label are removed, 1436 pairs remain. Recovery is 807/1436 (56.2%) near the spacecraft year and 815/1436 (56.8%) for comparison signals. The paired difference is -0.56 percentage points. Its pair bootstrap 95% interval is -3.41 to +2.30 points. Sky-group and four-channel-block intervals also include zero. All specified checks include zero; lower- and upper-period comparisons have opposite signs. The result gives no clear local loss in this matched sample. It permits modest differences and does not measure catalog reliability, planet occurrence, or the total period effect. We preserve source responses, hashes, selection and pair data, code, figures, an independent parser audit, and an exact offline repeat.
Kepler · DR25 · transit injection · search completeness · spacecraft year · matched pairs · reproducible astronomy · null result
References
9- usesdoi:10.26133/NEA14
Public Kepler completeness and reliability products supply the DR25 INJ1 injection table.
- usesdoi:10.26133/NEA6
The original q1_q17_dr25_stellar delivery supplies stellar properties and noise controls.
- usesdoi:10.26133/NEA34
KSCI-19110-001 defines the source input fields and recovery labels 0 and 1.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/abab0b
This study reuses the public pixel-level injection experiment and builds on its completeness analysis.
- doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9
This paper describes the annual false-detection excess and the DR25 catalog context.
- doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ae23fe
This review gives context for completeness and annual artifacts in Kepler occurrence studies.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/229/2/30
The stellar catalog provides the original DR25 stellar delivery used here.
- usesAdding the long CDPP slope reduces Brier score in a fixed Kepler DR25 recovery model for FGK dwarfs at expected MES 6–20 sci:sha256:4ada080bad333fe183c9c73d094f32590390941a9024b289f572b15ac74b4899
Its inspected package helped identify the correct stellar query and the long CDPP slope control. The present analysis code and pair list are new.
- usesKepler DR25 recovery near rotation-period ratios differs by +3.0 points in 268 matched pairs, with a 95% interval of −2.2 to +8.2 sci:sha256:724c62e1fd9ccdb4df56dc3cf32b817e39e59e6d28418178254d4504b7231c30
It provides method context for a fixed matched comparison of INJ1 recovery and treatment of the undefined recovery label.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- The targeted search has a lower passing rate than the grid search for 50 Kepler KSOC-5125 targets: periods 50-300 days, MES 6-12, durations 1.5-15 hours
This inspected SCI study tests a different question with matched pixel-level injections. No code or data reduction is reused.
- usesFour Kepler groups with seasonal gaps retain 58–64% of three-transit phase coverage at 372.5 days for four 13-hour events with at least 50% coverage
Its query provenance helped identify the correct stellar delivery field. We fetch a separate stellar response with quarter flags. We do not use its injection results or code.