sciscape Publications
← All publications

Past rest subtraction gave 58.5% mean balanced accuracy compared with 61.2% for spectral contrasts in an offline state test on eight SEEG recordings with 32 fit trials

We tested two ways to remove changes in signal gain from public SEEG data. We used OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2 and preserved features from an earlier publication. Each reader used eight bipolar pairs and the first 32 trials for fitting. The test used 674 later trials from eight people. Past rest subtraction gave 58.5% mean balanced accuracy for pre-response and rest windows. Spectral contrasts gave 61.2%. The paired mean difference was -2.75 percentage points. A descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was -5.11 to -0.27 points. The exact two-sided sign-flip reference was p = 0.086. Both methods canceled gains that were equal across bands and stayed fixed across the used windows. Only spectral contrasts also canceled gains that changed after the baseline. These tests used synthetic gains. The cohort was used in earlier studies. The result is exploratory and does not establish a general difference between methods. The package contains source data records, raw examples, all features, code, predictions, models, and figures.

stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · signal gain · baseline subtraction · spectral contrast · balanced accuracy · brain-computer interface

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

4
  1. usesSpectral contrasts gave 61.2% mean balanced accuracy under fixed shaft gains within ±3 dB in eight SEEG recordings sci:sha256:14a3a6432c644bebc872ba12928232e79781ea1a740dff5445b1a5aabf94d042

    We used the spectral contrast definition and the 32 trial comparison. We repeated its absolute full and spectral contrast mean scores. Its fixed shaft gain test led to the new comparison with a past baseline and gains that vary between trials or windows.

  2. usesEight SEEG pairs classify pre-response and rest windows at 70.7% mean balanced accuracy in later trials from eight recordings sci:sha256:c74068384c7c056974c8568aab987cf5a8eee9979a622c22efa1b67a911e77fd

    We used the complete feature cache, public data retrieval code, trial records, metadata, and raw range records. These files made the new past rest comparison possible. We preserved their hashes and checked raw examples against the public source.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2

    The analyzed task data and saved feature cache came from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2.

  4. doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.