sciscape Publications
← All publications

T16 TESS Year 1 catalog model depths are smaller than TOI depths (median ratio 1.21, 904 signals) and published planet depths (1.29, 168 planets), and the ratio increases with transit duration

The T16 catalog (Roth et al. 2026) gives 11,143 public transit candidates from TESS Year 1 full-frame images. The T16 light curves go through the Trend Filtering Algorithm (TFA). The T16 paper states that TFA can make transits shallower, by about 10% in radius, but it does not measure this effect for the catalog. We measured it. For each T16 row, we calculated the mid-transit depth of the catalog model (Rp/R*, b, q1, q2) with quadratic limb darkening. We matched the rows to the ExoFOP TOI table (same TIC, period within 1%) and to the NASA Exoplanet Archive composite table (same TIC and period, with published Rp/R* and b). We did not use grazing models. For 904 TOI matches, the median ratio of TOI depth to T16 depth is 1.209 (1-sigma range 1.193 to 1.220), and 85% of the ratios are more than 1. For 168 published planets, the median ratio is 1.288 (1.270 to 1.329). Both depths use the T16 limb darkening. The ratio increases with transit duration: for TOI matches, from 0.96 below 1.5 h to 1.38 above 6 h; for published planets, from 1.01 to 1.68. The ratio decreases with TESS magnitude, from 1.35 for Tmag < 11 to 1.05 for Tmag 14 to 17. The ratio is more than 1 for all TOI dispositions, also for false positives. Thus the cause is the light-curve processing, not the type of source. A linear fit of ln(ratio) to the TOI depths gives slopes of 0.204 +/- 0.017 for ln(duration), -0.042 +/- 0.005 per magnitude and -0.074 +/- 0.014 for ln(S/PN). The period term is not significant. The fit uses no published-planet data. When we apply it to the published planets, the median ratio falls from 1.288 to 1.053. We supply a depth scale and a scaled Rp/R* for all 11,143 rows. The median depth scale is 1.157 (radius scale 1.076). 2,686 rows are outside the fit range and use clipped inputs. Limits: the TOI and planet samples contain only signals that other pipelines found, and these are brighter and have higher S/PN than T16-only candidates; the S/PN term can come from this selection; TOI depths are also model results, and QLP depths of long transits can also be too small. Users of T16 depths, radii or injection tests must correct for this loss, mostly for transits longer than 3 h.

T16 · TESS · transit depth · Trend Filtering Algorithm · TFA · planet candidates · TESS Objects of Interest · ExoFOP · NASA Exoplanet Archive · planet radius · systematic bias · light-curve detrending · full-frame images · catalog calibration · limb darkening · injection-recovery

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

6
  1. supportsdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae5b6c

    T16 survey paper. Its Section V cautions that TFA may suppress transit depths and typically reduces radius by about 10%. We measure this loss for the catalog. Our result agrees in direction and approximate size (median radius about 9% small against TOIs) and shows that the loss increases with transit duration and decreases with magnitude.

  2. usesdoi:10.7910/DVN/CWEUGW

    T16 Cycle 1 candidate table, version 3.0 (CC0). It gives the model parameters (rp_rs, b, q1, q2, qtran, period, S/PN) that we test.

  3. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/adad42

    Describes the T16 image-subtraction light curves and the TFA processing that is the probable cause of the depth loss.

  4. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1

    TOI catalog. We use the ExoFOP TOI depths (SPOC and QLP) as the first reference.

  5. usesdoi:10.26133/NEA13

    NASA Exoplanet Archive Planetary Systems Composite Parameters, accessed 2026-10-21. We use the published Rp/R* and impact parameters as the second, independent reference.

  6. usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stt1435

    Conversion of the T16 q1 and q2 limb-darkening parameters to quadratic coefficients.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.