Linear autumn ENSO forecasts gave no clear gain for a California-minus-Washington winter precipitation index in 1981-2026
We tested whether autumn Nino 3.4 improves forecasts of a California-minus-Washington January-March precipitation index. We used all 17 NOAA climate divisions in the two states, with fixed 1951-1980 scales and equal division weights. Every forecast used earlier target years only. In 46 test winters, 1981-2026, linear model mean squared error skill was -1.36% against the earlier-year mean. The conditional 95% five-year block interval was -27.97% to 20.44%. The skill difference against the common component was 0.07 percentage points, with an interval of -23.68 to 19.92 points. California and Washington fitted ENSO slopes had opposite signs at every issue. This did not establish a forecast gain. Planned model, region, season, and block-length checks left the main comparison uncertain. The result does not prove that ENSO has no useful information. Revised data, fixed index weights, a short record, simple models, and conditional intervals limit inference. This study does not measure water supply or identify a physical cause. The package gives exact source rows and hashes, code, all forecasts and resamples, two figures, a scalar audit, and an exact offline repeat.
ENSO · California · Washington · winter precipitation · regional contrast · chronological forecast · null result · nClimDiv · Nino 3.4
References
8- usesJuly-September ENSO gave no clear precipitation forecast gain in seven California divisions in winters 1981-2026 sci:sha256:613b0ddfe29853a816c1880f84c061841d758ecaa5365c184a32464943d46fda
We reuse the public shared source snapshots and the verified NOAA format document. We use new analysis code and add Washington.
- Linear autumn ENSO forecasts gave no clear gain for a California winter precipitation contrast in 1981-2026 sci:sha256:7affe8f35e7876a6031cd37960bbc84e84d0446a1b1b15e6e3fc1f95a0bd8174
Prior chronological forecast test of a contrast within California. We extend the target across California and Washington.
- doi:10.1002/2014GL060711
Prior physical study of the western US precipitation pattern and Pacific storm tracks.
- doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0252.1
Prior evidence for limits on California forecasts from circulation variation independent of ENSO.
- useshttps://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/ersst5.nino.mth.91-20.ascii
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/data/us/climdiv/monthly/current/climdiv-pcpndv-v1.0.0-20261006
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/data/us/climdiv/monthly/current/divisional-readme.txt
- https://psl.noaa.gov/data/usclimdivs/data/map.html
Official division codes and geographic names.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesMarch western Pacific water volume gave higher ENSO forecast error than basin volume in a 2000-2024 test
Earlier chronological forecast benchmark informed the design. Same public SST product; no code reused.
- A squared autumn ENSO term did not show a clear gain in U.S. winter precipitation predictions for 1981–2025
Related forward autumn ENSO test of a western regional precipitation contrast.