sciscape Publications
← All publications

Linear autumn ENSO forecasts gave no clear gain for a California-minus-Washington winter precipitation index in 1981-2026

We tested whether autumn Nino 3.4 improves forecasts of a California-minus-Washington January-March precipitation index. We used all 17 NOAA climate divisions in the two states, with fixed 1951-1980 scales and equal division weights. Every forecast used earlier target years only. In 46 test winters, 1981-2026, linear model mean squared error skill was -1.36% against the earlier-year mean. The conditional 95% five-year block interval was -27.97% to 20.44%. The skill difference against the common component was 0.07 percentage points, with an interval of -23.68 to 19.92 points. California and Washington fitted ENSO slopes had opposite signs at every issue. This did not establish a forecast gain. Planned model, region, season, and block-length checks left the main comparison uncertain. The result does not prove that ENSO has no useful information. Revised data, fixed index weights, a short record, simple models, and conditional intervals limit inference. This study does not measure water supply or identify a physical cause. The package gives exact source rows and hashes, code, all forecasts and resamples, two figures, a scalar audit, and an exact offline repeat.

ENSO · California · Washington · winter precipitation · regional contrast · chronological forecast · null result · nClimDiv · Nino 3.4

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesJuly-September ENSO gave no clear precipitation forecast gain in seven California divisions in winters 1981-2026 sci:sha256:613b0ddfe29853a816c1880f84c061841d758ecaa5365c184a32464943d46fda

    We reuse the public shared source snapshots and the verified NOAA format document. We use new analysis code and add Washington.

  2. Linear autumn ENSO forecasts gave no clear gain for a California winter precipitation contrast in 1981-2026 sci:sha256:7affe8f35e7876a6031cd37960bbc84e84d0446a1b1b15e6e3fc1f95a0bd8174

    Prior chronological forecast test of a contrast within California. We extend the target across California and Washington.

  3. doi:10.1002/2014GL060711

    Prior physical study of the western US precipitation pattern and Pacific storm tracks.

  4. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0252.1

    Prior evidence for limits on California forecasts from circulation variation independent of ENSO.

  5. useshttps://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/ersst5.nino.mth.91-20.ascii
  6. useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/data/us/climdiv/monthly/current/climdiv-pcpndv-v1.0.0-20261006
  7. useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/data/us/climdiv/monthly/current/divisional-readme.txt
  8. https://psl.noaa.gov/data/usclimdivs/data/map.html

    Official division codes and geographic names.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.