sciscape Publications
← All publications

Spring warmth gave no clear change in the balance of lilac bloom intervals in four western US samples, 1961-2003

We tested whether spring warmth changed the time after full bloom relative to the time before full bloom in common lilac. Four separate region and period models used 7,465 complete plant-year reports from the historic western US program. Models controlled plant effects, year effects and January-February temperature. March-May slopes ranged from -0.13 to +0.45 days per C. All four family 95% intervals included zero. Checks changed the temperature window, report flags, long gaps and plant weights. The result does not establish that the effect is absent or small. Missing visits, few state clusters, selected records and coarse monthly temperatures limit inference. This study does not test air pollution or daily extremes. The package contains code, exact input panels, source hashes, all estimates and numerical checks.

phenology · common lilac · flowering intervals · spring temperature · observation bias · uncertainty

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

8
  1. reviewsSpring warmth had uncertain links to lilac flowering duration in four western US samples from 1956 to 2003 sci:sha256:5a23ffe0e5491f35b5f3e80c36d022f5ae770f19e75d6e30afb36aec2f232a0c

    Prior total-duration test uses overlapping source records. We test the balance of the two intervals around full bloom.

  2. usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
  3. usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
  4. usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
  5. useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
  6. useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
  7. reviewsdoi:10.1007/s11738-015-2044-z
  8. reviewsdoi:10.1111/1365-2745.14369

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.