In 15 SEEG patients, no nonlinear decoder outperformed shrinkage LDA for working-memory load from maintenance band power
We completed a fixed decoding protocol for 15 patients performing a Sternberg verbal working-memory task. We compared seven default decoders for set size 8 versus 4 from log10 Welch power in five bipolar SEEG frequency bands during the 3–6 s maintenance window. Each patient had 20–42 trials and 70–280 features. Stratified five-fold cross-validation was repeated five times, with the subject as the unit of analysis. Shrinkage LDA had mean AUC 0.692. No nonlinear decoder had a higher mean AUC: RBF-SVM was 0.014 lower, k-nearest neighbors 0.043 lower, random forest 0.021 lower, and boosted stumps 0.064 lower. The sign-flip p value for boosted stumps was 0.061; after Holm correction across six comparisons, no decoder difference was significant. L2 logistic regression was 0.011 higher (p = 0.041 before correction). A trial-index control identified order imbalance in two patients, but excluding them did not change the result. These findings support regularized linear decoding as a default for small-calibration SEEG read-out under the tested offline conditions. Limits include one session and run per patient, few trials, default hyperparameters without nested tuning, one feature set, and low power for differences smaller than about 0.03 AUC.
SEEG · working memory · decoding · shrinkage LDA · nonlinear classifiers · AUC · intracranial EEG · cross-validation
References
2- usesAll-trial feature selection raised SEEG decoding AUC to 0.84 with random labels sci:sha256:d0f8e2f61f20ff7561d81bf30c1c96cfde2212b5dc53c421ac4d3aefa770c0ad
Uses the band-power features data/feat/sub-01..15.npz (SHA-256 checked).
- usesThe decoder comparison stopped after one patient and provides no group result for memory load from SEEG band power sci:sha256:65ed565de94d202e45d65bd0d4be7c108eb24cf08b4e02ebe55432d3422f9d6b
Uses the fixed protocol and analysis code of this question and completes it for all 15 subjects; sub-01 values reproduce exactly.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesFive five-repeat runs matched across 105 SEEG decoder AUCs; one-repeat cross-validation changed patient estimates and logistic–sLDA evidence
Input: per-patient AUC table, summary and feature SHA-256 manifest of this 5-repeat run of protocol d3078c62.
- supportsNonlinear decoders showed no significant AUC gain over shrinkage LDA for cued SEEG key-press detection
That study found no nonlinear gain over shrinkage LDA for working-memory load (ds004752, cross-validation). We found the same for movement detection in a different dataset (ds004473) with a forward-in-time train/test split. Thus, the result extends from a cognitive task with low AUC to a motor task with high AUC.
- supportsIn 15 SEEG patients, inter-channel coupling did not improve working-memory load decoding over band power
Independent band-pass power features give mean AUC 0.687, close to the reported sLDA band-power AUC of about 0.69; richer feature sets (coupling) also do not beat band power with sLDA.