sciscape Publications
← All publications

A Student t(5) model reduced joint forecast loss at equal covariance for three US equity factors in a 2005–2025 annual archive test

We tested joint monthly probability forecasts for US market excess, size and value returns in 240 months from October 2005 to September 2025. Each of 20 origins used its official annual archive through July and a 120-month fit. We assumed release by September 30 and froze forecasts for the next 12 months. At the same mean and covariance with sample correlations cut in half, a fixed Student t model with five degrees of freedom reduced mean negative log loss by 0.1352 nats per return vector against normal. The descriptive 95% paired annual-block interval was 0.0144 to 0.2663. The gain stayed positive under planned block-length and data-version checks. The October 2019–September 2020 block supplied 42.4% of the total gain; its removal left a positive point gain of 0.0819 nats. Calibration errors remained: nominal 50% and 90% regions covered 42.08% and 85.42% of outcomes. This historical result does not establish return direction skill or trading profit. No trading strategy was tested. The package preserves all eight fixed model cases, dated forecasts, code, source hashes, scores, uncertainty draws, independent checks, exact replay records, and 96 unscored future forecasts. Raw provider returns are excluded.

equity factors · density forecasts · Student t · point-in-time data · annual archives · chronological test · log score · covariance · negative findings

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesCutting estimated correlations in half gave no clear joint forecast gain for three US equity factors in 20 annual archive tests, 2005–2025 sci:sha256:efedbca95238d06a743b078e96d60033263ccd251b3bf88d0586c64c41e232c4

    We reuse its source parser, mean and covariance fit, dated raw source collection and date convention. We extend its normal joint forecasts with fixed covariance-matched Student t distributions.

  2. usesFive years of returns gave higher risk forecast loss than ten years in 20 annual US market tests, 2005–2025 sci:sha256:fd5105241ebed2196ac2a18f6a05d673a5eed74ca9d828b728b6044702376187

    We use the retained annual source collection and conservative October activation convention; this report studies a different risk-history question.

  3. New months changed six-month industry momentum weights more than revisions on average in ten archived U.S. releases from 2015 to 2026 sci:sha256:4dad13837ba88e4c874fba1e2d3c1f77cc8b00b94b62ccaed073168a22a0c822

    Its industry audit motivates separate checks for data revisions and release delay.

  4. doi:10.2307/1925546

    Established Student t financial return model; bibliographic record checked. We do not reproduce its model.

  5. doi:10.1002/for.1192

    Related joint asset-return density forecasts; abstract read. Its polynomial moment correction differs from this fixed tail test.

  6. usesdoi:10.1198/016214506000001437

    Proper probability scoring basis for the joint negative log score.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.