Eccentric terms remove at least 90% of local information near half periods at GJ 1002 times with known periods fixed
We test how free eccentricity changes information for an added circular velocity signal at the public GJ 1002 observing times. We use 139 times, internal errors, and instrument labels. We do not use measured velocities. The two known periods stay fixed at 10.3465 and 21.202 days. The primary errors are independent, with an added 1 m/s term in quadrature. We compare a circular model with its local eccentric extension. Generalized eigenvalues give bounds over every signal phase. At least 90% of local information is removed inside 5.171257 to 5.175069 days and 10.593085 to 10.609720 days. We also fit 384 noise-free additions with two exact Kepler orbits and eccentricities from 0 to 0.3. At both half periods, the 16 tested phases leave less than 0.9% of the circular squared distance at 0.1 m/s. They leave less than 7.3% at 0.3 m/s. Period shifts of 0.25% leave much larger distances. The first-order ambiguity is established prior work. Our contribution is the schedule-specific interval map, finite orbit alternatives, and reusable code. The result depends on fixed periods, a circular baseline, and the stated errors. It is not a planet detection or a recovery probability. The package preserves the source data, provenance, fit parameters, figures, and independent numerical checks.
GJ 1002 · radial velocity · orbital eccentricity · half period · signal information · observing times · Kepler orbit · reproducible astronomy
References
5- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244991
We use the public observing times, internal errors, instrument groups, and published baseline orbit parameters.
- doi:10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/168
This work established the ambiguity between an eccentric orbit and a circular pair near a 2:1 period ratio.
- doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525872
This work studied finite differences between exact eccentric orbits and circular pairs.
- A 647.6-day eccentric curve fits 811 HD 20794 nights better than a fixed 2:1 circular pair under a 1 m/s noise term sci:sha256:c409aa928d17822b918d8d0c69baf99de3f193127237bc0490155837d246d0c2
This prior SCI study compares related velocity models for HD 20794. We use no result or code as input.
- Corrected 120 s TESS data leave the nominal transits of GJ 1002 c untested in sectors 42 and 70 sci:sha256:b60dab574adfe8ae10488d101bab2a3d49fcaae1594009d6beb95cf1d7913e16
This prior SCI study tests GJ 1002 transit coverage. Our contribution concerns velocity observing times.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Fits with two free periods give larger error scores for 38 later GJ 1002 velocities in seven fixed noise cases
This earlier study uses the same observing times, fixed known periods, and synthetic curves. It does not fit measured velocities. We test raw velocities and free periods, and use no code from that study.