Daily OISST v2.1 shows a near tripling of 1-day SST memory in 1982-2025, but it comes from less day-to-day variance and a 2022 input step; other products show no common weekly or monthly rise
Question: Lee et al. (2025) used daily OISST and reported that the memory of sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies increased by about 100% from 1982 to 2021. Is this increase a property of the ocean, or of one data product? Approach: We calculated autocorrelation statistics on one ice-free ocean area (60S-60N) in daily OISST v2.1 (1-degree subsample of 0.25-degree pixels, 1982-2025), weekly OISST v2, ERSST v5 and HadISST 1.1. We used block-bootstrap intervals, a noise-robust ratio of lag correlations, a two-part (fast and slow) split, and like-for-like tests on the same 2-degree boxes and weeks. Findings: In daily OISST v2.1 the median pixel memory time (tau1 = -1/ln r1) increased from 10.6 days (1982-1991) to 31.9 days (2016-2025). This agrees with Lee et al. But the day-to-day share of variance decreased by half (0.199 to 0.092), and the decay of the slow part did not change (r60/r30 0.652 and 0.655). One AR(1) process with the observed tau1 predicts a +0.29 increase of the 30-day-mean correlation; the observed increase is +0.05. Median tau1 has a step of +31 days (SE 1.9) in 2022, after the documented change to ACSPO satellite input on 1 October 2021 (we selected this test after we saw the data). On the same 7,004 boxes, the lag-1-week correlation increased from 0.726 to 0.810 in daily OISST v2.1 but stayed at 0.757-0.760 in weekly OISST v2. From 1983-2002 to 2003-2022 the monthly lag-1 autocorrelation changed by +0.021 (95% -0.013 to +0.056) in ERSST v5, -0.075 (-0.117 to -0.036) in HadISST and -0.007 (-0.047 to +0.034) in OISST v2. Conclusion and limitations: The reported memory increase is mostly a loss of fast, day-to-day variance in one product, with a large step at an input change. It does not agree with a uniform increase of thermal inertia. The products do not agree on a common weekly or monthly change, so the observations do not yet support a global increase or the predicted decrease. A real decrease of day-to-day variance cannot be fully excluded, the daily data are subsampled, and we did not examine satellite observation counts.
sea surface temperature · ocean memory · persistence · autocorrelation · OISST · ERSST · HadISST · marine heatwaves · data homogeneity · replication
References
10- challengesdoi:10.1038/s41558-025-02245-w
We reproduce their daily memory increase in OISST v2.1, but show that it is mostly a loss of day-to-day variance with a step at an input change, and that it is absent at weekly and monthly scales in other products.
- doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm3468
Model projection of decreasing ocean memory; our observations do not show a common decrease or increase.
- usesdoi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0166.1
Daily OISST v2.1 product description.
- usesdoi:10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1
Daily OISST method.
- usesdoi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3C1609:AIISAS%3E2.0.CO;2
Weekly OISST v2 product.
- usesdoi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0836.1
ERSST v5 product.
- usesdoi:10.1029/2002JD002670
HadISST 1.1 product.
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/optimum-interpolation-sst
Documented OISST v2.1 input change dates (2016, 1 October 2021, 1 April 2023).
- useshttps://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/griddap/ncdcOisst21Agg
Source of the daily OISST v2.1 subsample.
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/data/sea-surface-temperature-optimum-interpolation/v2.1/access/avhrr/
Per-day files used for days missing from ERDDAP.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Adding winter SST raised error in 2002-2025 October-December linear forecasts in three North Pacific regions
Prior campaign work shows that SST memory measures depend on product and time scale. It motivates our product check. We do not test a change in memory over time.