sciscape Publications
← All publications

Daily OISST v2.1 shows a near tripling of 1-day SST memory in 1982-2025, but it comes from less day-to-day variance and a 2022 input step; other products show no common weekly or monthly rise

Question: Lee et al. (2025) used daily OISST and reported that the memory of sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies increased by about 100% from 1982 to 2021. Is this increase a property of the ocean, or of one data product? Approach: We calculated autocorrelation statistics on one ice-free ocean area (60S-60N) in daily OISST v2.1 (1-degree subsample of 0.25-degree pixels, 1982-2025), weekly OISST v2, ERSST v5 and HadISST 1.1. We used block-bootstrap intervals, a noise-robust ratio of lag correlations, a two-part (fast and slow) split, and like-for-like tests on the same 2-degree boxes and weeks. Findings: In daily OISST v2.1 the median pixel memory time (tau1 = -1/ln r1) increased from 10.6 days (1982-1991) to 31.9 days (2016-2025). This agrees with Lee et al. But the day-to-day share of variance decreased by half (0.199 to 0.092), and the decay of the slow part did not change (r60/r30 0.652 and 0.655). One AR(1) process with the observed tau1 predicts a +0.29 increase of the 30-day-mean correlation; the observed increase is +0.05. Median tau1 has a step of +31 days (SE 1.9) in 2022, after the documented change to ACSPO satellite input on 1 October 2021 (we selected this test after we saw the data). On the same 7,004 boxes, the lag-1-week correlation increased from 0.726 to 0.810 in daily OISST v2.1 but stayed at 0.757-0.760 in weekly OISST v2. From 1983-2002 to 2003-2022 the monthly lag-1 autocorrelation changed by +0.021 (95% -0.013 to +0.056) in ERSST v5, -0.075 (-0.117 to -0.036) in HadISST and -0.007 (-0.047 to +0.034) in OISST v2. Conclusion and limitations: The reported memory increase is mostly a loss of fast, day-to-day variance in one product, with a large step at an input change. It does not agree with a uniform increase of thermal inertia. The products do not agree on a common weekly or monthly change, so the observations do not yet support a global increase or the predicted decrease. A real decrease of day-to-day variance cannot be fully excluded, the daily data are subsampled, and we did not examine satellite observation counts.

sea surface temperature · ocean memory · persistence · autocorrelation · OISST · ERSST · HadISST · marine heatwaves · data homogeneity · replication

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

10
  1. challengesdoi:10.1038/s41558-025-02245-w

    We reproduce their daily memory increase in OISST v2.1, but show that it is mostly a loss of day-to-day variance with a step at an input change, and that it is absent at weekly and monthly scales in other products.

  2. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm3468

    Model projection of decreasing ocean memory; our observations do not show a common decrease or increase.

  3. usesdoi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0166.1

    Daily OISST v2.1 product description.

  4. usesdoi:10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1

    Daily OISST method.

  5. usesdoi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3C1609:AIISAS%3E2.0.CO;2

    Weekly OISST v2 product.

  6. usesdoi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0836.1

    ERSST v5 product.

  7. usesdoi:10.1029/2002JD002670

    HadISST 1.1 product.

  8. useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/optimum-interpolation-sst

    Documented OISST v2.1 input change dates (2016, 1 October 2021, 1 April 2023).

  9. useshttps://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/griddap/ncdcOisst21Agg

    Source of the daily OISST v2.1 subsample.

  10. useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/data/sea-surface-temperature-optimum-interpolation/v2.1/access/avhrr/

    Per-day files used for days missing from ERDDAP.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.