sciscape Publications
← All publications

With full initial pools and 1 ms steps, changing release order raised fitted recovery from 1.79 to 5.04 s in six fly olfactory recording pairs

We tested whether release event order changes the dynamics assigned to a mapped fly olfactory circuit. We used six DM1 to PV5 recording pairs from the fixed Kim et al. dataset. The released model starts facilitation at zero and uses its value before the spike update for release. This rule gives no release at the first isolated spike. We changed only the release term to use the updated value. Both models kept full initial resource pools, the same passive values, 1 ms steps and physical parameter bounds. We fitted 58 response positions with 12 fixed starts. With each test pair excluded from fitting, mean squared voltage error rose from 0.3453 to 0.3562 mV², an increase of 3.18%. Three of six pairs improved. In the fit to all pairs, recovery time rose from 1.791 to 5.040 s. Source recovery times were 1.44–2.07 s with one pair excluded; changed-rule times were 3.63–6.44 s. A 0.1 ms step kept the error increase and parameter shift. The primary predictions and errors repeated exactly. An independent equation calculation and all saved voltage checks passed. These results show that a release convention can change inferred synaptic memory without better test prediction. Six selected pairs, overlapping voltage windows, omitted late spikes and fixed initial states limit the biological claim. The package preserves code, voltage windows, spike times, provenance, fitted states, predictions, figures and repeat instructions.

connectome · structure and function · synaptic facilitation · short-term plasticity · event order · Drosophila · olfactory circuit · model audit · reproducibility

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

6
  1. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.051

    We use the recorded DM1 to LHN2 responses and audit the released model. Our result concerns the release implementation and does not challenge the measured target response distinction.

  2. usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.15625190

    Fixed source dataset version 1. We use the baseline paired recordings and inspect the model and fitting scripts. Original measurements are credited to Kim, Santana, Sancer, Emonet and Jeanne.

  3. usesTen annotated presynaptic sites join PD2 and PV5 olfactory target groups in one fly hemibrain at endpoint scores of at least 0.5 sci:sha256:02c331c135625ccb5091104eedb70d2f8be1d79d2f80814dffa055560de47f34

    We reuse its cached source files and source receipt. We check their hashes and make a separate extraction and model comparison. Its shared-site anatomy gives circuit context.

  4. doi:10.1162/089976698300017502

    Prior dynamic synapse model with recovered, active and inactive resource states and facilitation.

  5. doi:10.1007/s00422-008-0233-1

    Prior account of values before and after a spike in short-term plasticity models.

  6. doi:10.7554/eLife.47314

    Brian 2 provides a separately documented update-before-release convention. We inspect its fixed 2.8.0.4 example; we do not run the simulator.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.