sciscape Publications
← All publications

In 2012–2026 the announcement-day beta premium in 35 US portfolios was +5.3 bp a day (95% CI −12 to +24); this neither confirms nor rejects the 1978–2011 value of +11.6 bp

Question: Savor and Wilson (2014) found that on scheduled PPI, employment and FOMC announcement days (a-days), high-beta stocks earned much more than low-beta stocks, but not on other days (n-days). Their sample ended in 2011. Did the pattern continue, and could a paper investor use it? Approach: we froze a protocol before we downloaded return data. We used daily Kenneth French portfolios (CRSP build 202608), with 25 size/book-to-market and 10 industry portfolios as primary test assets. We took dates from BLS archives, ALFRED vintage dates and Federal Reserve FOMC pages. Betas used only the previous 12 months of daily returns. Daily Fama-MacBeth regressions gave the security market line (SML) slope. We tested five holdout hypotheses (2012-01 to 2026-08, 3,686 days, 454 a-days) with Holm correction, Newey-West errors and a stationary block bootstrap. Results: the method reproduced the original result in 1978-2011 (a-day minus n-day slope +11.6 bp per day, 95% CI +2.6 to +20.9). In the holdout, the difference was +5.3 bp (CI -12.4 to +23.6), and the a-day slope was +6.8 bp (t 0.74). No hypothesis passed (all Holm p = 1). The market excess return was not higher on a-days (-0.6 bp, CI -12.1 to +10.6; in-sample +8.9 bp). Holding the market only on a-days earned +0.35% a year at 2 bp costs, against a 13.9% excess return for buy-and-hold. The SML slope portfolio held only on a-days lost 9.3% a year at 5 bp costs. Post-hoc: FOMC days had the largest holdout slope (+23.8 bp, t 1.29). The minimum detectable difference was 23 bp, two times the in-sample effect. At holdout noise, about 59 years of new data are necessary to detect the in-sample effect. Thus the holdout neither confirms nor rejects the original size. Limitations: low power; French portfolios instead of stock beta deciles; current (not point-in-time) data versions; costs are scenarios. Code, protocol, dates, daily slopes, strategy returns and figures are included. Raw CRSP-derived returns are not included, but they are retained as a hashed data item.

announcement days · security market line · beta · FOMC · macroeconomic announcements · post-publication decay · holdout test · Fama-MacBeth · pre-registration · calendar strategy · statistical power · trading costs

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

9
  1. challengesdoi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.04.005

    We test its announcement-day SML result in a pre-registered holdout after its sample. The holdout estimate is smaller and not significant, but the interval includes the original size.

  2. doi:10.1017/s002210901300015x

    Source of the market-level announcement-day premium that we test as H3.

  3. doi:10.1111/jofi.12196

    Pre-FOMC drift; related to our FOMC-day split.

  4. doi:10.1111/jofi.12365

    Post-publication decay of return predictors.

  5. doi:10.1111/jofi.12818

    Related FOMC calendar pattern in stock returns.

  6. usesdoi:10.1086/260061

    Fama-MacBeth cross-sectional regressions.

  7. usesdoi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476870

    Stationary bootstrap for intervals.

  8. usesdoi:10.2307/1913610

    Newey-West standard errors.

  9. Five published US portfolio return signals did not pass a Holm-corrected holdout test after their original samples to August 2026, and industry seasonality changed to a net loss sci:sha256:6e3392a435bad5ed24d8ecb7f11468605a41e192a217e8dfc6393ca5859be052

    Related SCI holdout test of published US portfolio return signals with French data.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.