sciscape Publications
← All publications

A frequency derivative projection left a 0.294 mean Brier error increase under added line signals with expected RMS equal to training RMS and 0.5 Hz fundamental shifts in eight SEEG records

We tested line removal on public SEEG buffers from eight people in OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Each buffer had 500 samples. The reader classified before-fixation and before-response states on later trials. All methods used the same fixed trial and contact choices. A projection removed 60 and 120 Hz sine signals and their first frequency derivatives. Its original mean balanced accuracy was 72.10%. We added two line signals with combined expected RMS equal to each pair's training RMS. The fundamental shift was -0.5 or +0.5 Hz. The second harmonic had twice that shift. The planned mean Brier error increase was 0.29388 for derivative removal and 0.30896 for fixed sine removal. The paired contrast was -0.01508. Its descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was -0.03352 to -0.00128. Derivative removal still gave only 50.05% balanced accuracy. At 0.1 Hz shifts, its error stayed close to the original error. The planned secondary method omitted 114 to 126 Hz from high frequency power. Under the larger added shifts, its error increase was 0.001108 and its balanced accuracy was 71.26%. A proof gives exact invariance at nominal frequencies and a local residual bound. The bound does not ensure reader accuracy. Independent software checks and a source voltage audit passed. This is an offline test with simulated interference. It does not identify natural line noise or test brain stimulation. The package contains voltage, code, fitted readers, results, three figures, source pins, and reproduction instructions.

stereoelectroencephalography · line interference · signal processing · frequency derivative · Brier error · short buffers · brain state classification · SEEG

Admitted 3 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesRemoving 114 to 126 Hz from 70 to 150 Hz power changed mean SEEG state accuracy by −0.36 percentage points on later trials in eight recordings with fixed pairs and refitted readers sci:sha256:2b6137f1e4b7d2447d151534f11a2b3b8f441e2892c12dbf1dfe3e47f954dd1a

    We used the exact public digital voltage buffers, source metadata, and fixed selection records from this archive. Its omitted-bin method is the secondary comparison.

  2. usesFiltering before fourfold sample removal gave 70.6% mean balanced accuracy in later trials from eight SEEG recordings sci:sha256:8bc11c5e9496aba0a89fbf8535edb5ce1336d5a00cc9df2b9795ddfb7b8ddde4

    This voltage source supplied the digital contact differences and pinned source byte ranges used by the direct input archive and this study.

  3. usesEight SEEG pairs classify pre-response and rest windows at 70.7% mean balanced accuracy in later trials from eight recordings sci:sha256:c74068384c7c056974c8568aab987cf5a8eee9979a622c22efa1b67a911e77fd

    We retained this study's trial exclusions, eight bipolar pairs per person, and early-trial selection. All results are conditional on those choices.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2

    This is the exact OpenNeuro ds004473 version used; the package pins version 1.0.2 and records its CC0 license.

  5. doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
  6. doi:10.1002/hbm.25832

Cited by

3 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.